January 9, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

The potential benefits of bringing online connectivity to everyday objects as part of the Internet of Things may be extensive, but so are the privacy and security risks, the chairwoman of the Federal Telecommunications Commission (FTC) warns.

Speaking at the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES) in Las Vegas this week, FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said she was concerned about the way sensor networks would be used to collect, manage and store information, the Wall Street Journal reported. Among the dangers, she noted, were the possible ways in which the Internet of Things might expose more information for cybercriminals to target through a variety of means.

Over the years, the CES has evolved far beyond its origins as a place for basic household appliances to an exhibition filled with emerging technology, from power smartphones to wearable devices and even washing machines. This year, the Internet of Things was a major theme. Experts say even an alarm clock or a refrigerator could now be set up to convey information about its energy use or need for new parts through an app or a signal back to the manufacturer.

According to an article on SlashGear, Ramirez acknowledged that the Internet of Things could make life better for consumers. In order for companies to succeed, however, she said they will first have to ensure their customers are comfortable that the information that travels via Internet Protocol connectivity is truly safe. That should be the top priority as new products and services make their way from CES to the mainstream market.

While public officials sometimes speak in generalities about these types of issues, Computerworld noted that Ramirez had some highly useful ideas about helping consumers avoid putting themselves at risk. For example, she said that besides encryption, companies should make sure any default passwords aren’t so basic that they could be easily guessed by cybercriminals. This has already been a problem with home routers, which some cybercriminals have been breaking into to gain access to Domain Name System settings.

Ramirez suggested that companies should hold off on collecting data now when consumers don’t realize what’s going on and when the use of the data isn’t clear, according to MicroScope. This “just-in-case” mentality is dangerous because it builds up a treasure trove for cybercriminals who would have no trouble coming up with their own ideas for profiting from it.

According to New York Daily News, Ramirez’s bottom line was to design security into the Internet of Things from the get-go and conduct thorough testing long before it is launched. CES gets the world excited about what’s next. The problem is that in some cases, the cybercriminals get excited, too.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today