June 27, 2017 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Security researchers discovered a haunting technique that they’re calling a GhostHook attack, which uses a feature in Intel central processing units (CPUs) to take over 64-bit Windows systems. Windows has traditionally been safe from most cybercriminals trying to install rootkits, but the GhostHook attack can bypass PatchGuard, which was specifically developed to protect its operating system at the kernel level.

Experts at CyberArk described how Intel Processor Trace (IPT), which captures information about software on a PC to deal with debugging and other issues, could open a way to hook rootkits onto Windows. This would be very difficult to detect, hence the “ghost” moniker.

Hooking is not always used for malicious purposes, Dark Reading noted, and fraudsters would need to already have malware present on the system to exploit a rootkit. The GhostHook attack is particularly scary, however, because it’s happening on the kernel level. That means it’s impervious to many security products, including personal firewalls and even intrusion prevention systems (IPS).

GhostHook Attack Degrades Defenses

PatchGuard isn’t effective here. As Bleeping Computer explained, CyberArk researchers were able to allocate extremely small buffers to packets of code in IPT. Eventually, the CPU needs additional space and attempts to deal with the code by opening a performance monitoring interrupt (PMI) handler.

The GhostHook attack is extremely clever because PatchGuard wasn’t designed to look at what happens within PMI handlers. That’s also why it’s possible to plant a rootkit as the system is being patched.

Although there haven’t been any public accounts of cybercriminal activity using the GhostHook attack, a CyberArk researcher told iTWire that Windows admins should be on guard. If used in combination with disk-wiping malware, for instance, cybercriminals could do a lot of damage before they’ve ever discovered by authorities.

The Industry Responds

Microsoft has been informed about the GhostHook attack. According to CyberArk, however, the software giant said the flaw likely would not be addressed, except possibly in a future version of Windows.

It’s also possible that Intel will make it more difficult to pursue the technique in its next generation of IPT technology. Since attackers would need to have malware on the PC already, this is not yet a full-blown emergency — more like a phantom menace.

More from

Cybersecurity trends: IBM’s predictions for 2025

4 min read - Cybersecurity concerns in 2024 can be summed up in two letters: AI (or five letters if you narrow it down to gen AI). Organizations are still in the early stages of understanding the risks and rewards of this technology. For all the good it can do to improve data protection, keep up with compliance regulations and enable faster threat detection, threat actors are also using AI to accelerate their social engineering attacks and sabotage AI models with malware.AI might have…

Cloud threat report: Why have SaaS platforms on dark web marketplaces decreased?

3 min read - IBM’s X-Force team recently released the latest edition of the Cloud Threat Landscape Report for 2024, providing a comprehensive outlook on the rise of cloud infrastructure adoption and its associated risks.One of the key takeaways of this year’s report was focused on the gradual decrease in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms being mentioned across dark web marketplaces. While this trend potentially points to more cloud platforms increasing their defensive posture and limiting the number of exploits or compromised credentials that are surfacing,…

Mobile device security: Why protection is critical in the hybrid workforce

4 min read - In our mobile-first/mobile-last world, many employees’ work days both start and end on a mobile device. Mobile devices are now essential tools for productivity and communication. As many organizations transition to hybrid work environments, mobile devices offer a rich target for malicious actors because they are often the least protected corporate devices and offer platforms from which to launch social engineering attacks.Unlike traditional computers, which are generally well-defended with antivirus software and cybersecurity protocols, mobile devices are frequently left vulnerable…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today