July 18, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Google will make a major change next week to its two-step verification (2SV) policy that will eliminate an older method that left users at risk.

While the previous method sent one-time codes via short messaging service (SMS), which was reported by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as being fundamentally insecure, the new 2SV procedure will prevent malicious actors from hijacking phone sessions to gain SMS codes.

The New Two-Step Verification Process

Two-step verification adds the requirement of supplying information that Google sends to the user in real time to establish a session. That information may be delivered through an SMS message, voice call or mobile app.

With the old process, the user typically typed in a password string sent over SMS to complete a login. However, in the new method, simply tapping a button displayed on the user’s smartphone will allow the process to move forward. Also displayed will be geographic location, time and name of the device attempting the login. The user will be expected to pay attention to this information and alert Google of any discrepancies.

User Requirements

Legacy methods will still be available to users in case of compatibility problems. Google users must be currently enrolled in the 2SV program to be included in the new changes. Bleeping Computer added that iOS users must have the Google Search app installed on their devices to see the 2SV login prompts. The new method also requires a smartphone that is connected to the internet, which may be problematic for users who rely on classic phone network connectivity.

Those who connect by using a security key, which plugs into a computer’s USB port for 2SV, may not feel the new method will add any security benefits. Google agrees with this view, and those users will not be asked to join this upgrade program.

Google deserves credit for attempting to increase 2SV security in the face of the NIST criticism. This is one way to make insecure password logins a thing of the past — without introducing new types of insecurities.

More from

Third-party access: The overlooked risk to your data protection plan

2 min read - A recent IBM Cost of a Data Breach report reveals a startling statistic: Only 42% of companies discover breaches through their own security teams. This highlights a significant blind spot, especially when it comes to external partners and vendors.The financial stakes are steep. On average, a data breach affecting multiple environments costs a whopping $4.88 million. A major breach at a telecommunications provider in January 2023 served as a stark reminder of the risks associated with third-party relationships. In this…

Will arresting the National Public Data threat actor make a difference?

3 min read - The arrest of USDoD, the mastermind behind the colossal National Public Data breach, was a victory for law enforcement. It also raises some fundamental questions. Do arrests and takedowns truly deter cyberattacks? Or do they merely mark the end of one criminal’s chapter while others rise to take their place? As authorities continue to crack down on cyber criminals, the arrest of high-profile threat actors like USDoD reveals a deeper, more complex reality about the state of global cyber crime.…

What makes a trailblazer? Inspired by John Mulaney’s Dreamforce roast

4 min read - When you bring a comedian to offer a keynote address, you need to expect the unexpected.But it is a good bet that no one in the crowd at Salesforce’s Dreamforce conference expected John Mulaney to tell a crowd of thousands of tech trailblazers that they were, in fact, not trailblazers at all.“The fact that there are 45,000 ‘trailblazers’ here couldn’t devalue the title anymore,” Mulaney told the audience.Maybe it was meant as nothing more than a punch line, but Mulaney’s…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today