July 31, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Phishing is a key part of the threat actor’s toolkit, especially to get cyberattacks off the ground. As noted by Dark Reading, some estimates suggested that 91 percent of all cyberattacks start with a phishing attack. This shouldn’t come as a surprise given the increasing sophistication of automated security tools and the reliable social pressure exerted on employees when they see emails that say “act now” or “your account has been compromised.”

But it begs the question: Are cybercriminals more advanced than the users they target? Research firm Imperva created 90 honeypot email and file-sharing accounts to find out. Here’s a look at the phishing attack playbook — and how users can shake the hook.

Not So Sophisticated

The Imperva team monitored their fake accounts over a period of nine months, using traps contained in links and documents to discover how threat actors operated and what they were doing with stolen data. The researchers found that while malicious actors have distinct preferences when it comes to exploitable data, they’re unconcerned about both attack speed and their own security.

For example, the report noted that 25 percent of phishers went after business-related data by looking at email subject lines. But over 50 percent of cybercriminals took more than a day to access accounts after they were compromised, Help Net Security said. Additionally, 74 percent of threat actors triggered bait alerts within three minutes of accessing email inboxes, indicating that they’re likely using manual techniques rather than automated tools.

Despite having access to massive amounts of personal information, less than half of all compromised credentials were exploited. This indicated that attackers may have such a wealth of data available that they can pick and choose accounts with the highest value.

Phishers were also unconcerned with avoiding security scrutiny. According to Help Net Security, 83 percent “did little to cover their tracks.” Of the 15 percent who erased new sign-in email alerts from the inbox, most neglected to clean up the trash folder, and just 39 percent made any effort to obfuscate their origin IP using Tor services or proxies.

Swimming Free From a Phishing Attack

There are some hooks users simply can’t avoid. For example, Computer Business Review reported that a Gmail phishing scam leveraged actual Google links and the company’s use of OAuth to trick users into providing third-party permissions, without the need for victims to re-enter credentials. But the laziness and sloppiness of most phishing attacks creates a small window for users: If they act quickly and decisively enough, it’s possible to wriggle free.

First, pay attention to email inboxes and file-sharing account alerts. If there’s any indication that a new user has signed in or secondary email addresses have been added for recovery, chances are a phishing attack is underway. Users need to check both the trash and sent folders to see if any suspicious messages have appeared or were sent out to other potential victims.

The Imperva team found that if users changed their password within 24 hours of the original phishing attempt, there was a 56 percent chance of preventing account takeover. By notifying email and file-sharing providers of potential attacks, along with changing all connected usernames and passwords — such as banking portals, e-commerce storefronts and any government accounts — it’s possible to frustrate most phishing efforts.

Phishing works — and continues to work — because email is ubiquitous and users don’t do enough to effectively secure accounts. But attackers are no better, leaving ample opportunity for on-the-ball observers to lock down accounts and send phish hooks back up empty.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today