March 15, 2018 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

The Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining ground. As noted by ZDNet, the number of connected devices is on par with the global population. This proliferation of endpoints will give rise to what IDG Connect called a “jobs revolution.”

But it’s not all smooth sailing. According to CSO Online, IoT devices create a kind of security “blind spot,” which opens unique avenues of attack for malicious actors. In light of this expanded threat surface, the Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC) released an “Endpoint Security Best Practices” guide to help companies transition from talking about IoT security to actively implementing effective controls.

Endpoint Protection Key to IoT Security

The rapid adoption of IoT ecosystems creates a familiar problem: companies prioritizing speed over security to be first to market. As a result, attackers are exploiting limited security controls to compromise connected systems.

Consider the increasing use of botnet-based threats that leverage insecure devices such as digital cameras and wirelessly connected sensors. In many cases, IoT security amounts to little more than recycled login and password information, enabling cybercriminals to create high-volume botnets that can compromise even robust web services. As noted by Semiconductor Engineering, the sheer volume of data processed by these devices is also on the rise, making them lucrative targets for threat actors looking to lock down or steal critical corporate information.

Even attempts to curb potential IoT security oversights often fail to strike a balance between efficacy and potential data exposure. According to Dark Reading, legislation currently under discussion in 17 states would compel original equipment manufacturer (OEMs) to share source code, operating system information and security schematic data with any product owner to assist in repairing or restoring damaged devices. The problem is that malicious actors could use these provisions to insert their own malicious code or simply purchase the products in question to gain intimate knowledge of IoT security and reverse engineer attacks.

Actionable Advice From the IIC

While these threats aren’t new, the IIC guide detailed how specific controls and countermeasures can be used to achieve defined security levels:

  • BasicThis includes root of trust (RoT) protocols, which provide endpoint identity and attestation of software integrity, along with secure boot services, cryptographic services and secure communications.
  • EnhancedThe next level of security adds endpoint management and configuration designed to improve control on a device-by-device basis.
  • CriticalThese measures include security information and event management (SIEM), which allows organizations to continuously monitor devices and respond to potential compromise attempts using contextually triggered rules.

As noted by Infosecurity Magazine, the IIC’s endpoint advice is “primarily targeted at improving the security of new endpoints,” but can also be used to improve legacy IoT devices. According to the IIC, these best practices aren’t intended as “the basis for certification or as a checklist,” but could help inform organizations as they develop their own certification protocols.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today