August 22, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Ransomware is often able to bypass signature-based antivirus protection, leaving many security experts to question protection efficacy. Thycotic conducted a survey of Black Hat 2017 conference attendees to see what they thought about current security products. The results weren’t good.

For example, 73 percent of respondents said that traditional perimeter security firewalls and antivirus protection products were irrelevant to their data breaching efforts or otherwise obsolete. This complements a survey conducted by WatchGuard about traditional (signature-based) antivirus programs, which found that those solutions missed about 30 percent of threats.

Ransomware Risk

Ransomware, as a category, is one of the malware types that makes traditional antivirus protection programs ineffective. One simulated threat exercise in March of this year found that only 52 percent of potential threats were thwarted by a traditional antivirus product approach, according to CSO Online. Additionally, an IBM study found that nearly half of businesspeople reported being hit by ransomware last year, with 70 percent of those organizations ponying up the ransom.

If threat actors find that a class of malware has a high success rate, they will obviously continue their efforts with it. And if an organization is slow to update its antivirus products with the latest information, the success rate of such attacks increases.

Your Father’s Antivirus Protection Product

Traditional antivirus products shouldn’t be written off entirely: They excel at spotting known threats. However, for a threat to be known, a user has to be hit first.

Raja Patel, vice president for corporate product at McAfee, summed up the situation to CSO Online, saying that “signature-based defenses will protect you after you know about the threats, but they won’t protect patient zero and the time period after infection and when you wrote the signatures.”

While these products aren’t perfect, it’s better than no protection at all. Luckily, new developments are in progress that will strengthen antivirus capabilities.

A New Approach

Another method has been added to the antivirus repertoire, and it is where much of current research effort is going: a combination of behavior analytics, sandboxing and machine learning. But it comes with a cost. More computational power is required to perform these tasks. Running extra tests on files may adversely impact productivity as well.

Traditional antivirus does have its place in the security lineup. It’s a simple and fast way to deal with threats that have already been established, which is a good first line of defense. But defense that is in-depth, using nontraditional techniques, may prove to be more valuable to the security team in dealing with unique problems.

More from

We are moving!

< 1 min read - SecurityIntelligence.com is being sunset, but have no fear!We have a new home for all of your favorite security and X-Force content.Follow us to www.ibm.com/think to maintain access to the stories and news you love, both new and old.Security Intelligence will officially sunset on Friday, March 28, 2025. To access the latest security thought leadership, go here. To access the latest X-Force research, go here.If you are experiencing cybersecurity issues or an incident, contact X-Force® to help:US hotline: 1-888-241-9812 | Global hotline:…

Bypassing Windows Defender Application Control with Loki C2

10 min read - Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) is a security solution that restricts execution to trusted software. Since it is classified as a security boundary, Microsoft offers bug bounty payouts for qualifying bypasses, making it an active and competitive field of research.Typical outcomes of a WDAC bypass bug bounty submission:Bypass is fixed; possible bounty awardedBypass is not fixed but instead "mitigated" by being added to the WDAC recommended block list. Likely no bounty awarded but honorable mention is typically givenBypass is not…

FYSA — VMware Critical Vulnerabilities Patched

< 1 min read - SummaryBroadcom has released a security bulletin, VMSA-2025-0004, addressing and remediating three vulnerabilities that, if exploited, could lead to system compromise. Products affected include vCenter Server, vRealize Operations Manager, and vCloud Director.Threat TopographyThreat Type: Critical VulnerabilitiesIndustry: VirtualizationGeolocation: GlobalOverviewX-Force Incident Command is monitoring activity surrounding Broadcom’s Security Bulletin (VMSA-2025-0004) for three potentially critical vulnerabilities in VMware products. These vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2025-22224, CVE-2025-22225, and CVE-2025-22226, have reportedly been exploited in attacks. X-Force has not been able to validate those claims. The vulnerabilities…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today