A misconfigured API port has led to a months-long campaign in which cybercriminals have been launching daily Kinsing malware attacks that number in the thousands, according to security researchers.

Directed at enterprises operating container environments, the cryptocurrency miner exploits the API port on a host running Ubuntu and then tries to infect an ever-larger number of hosts, a report from Aqua Security noted.

Hackers rigged the Ubuntu container to clear logs, eliminate other malicious software and disable security protections. Once those tasks have been completed, the Kinsing malware download begins in order to mine for cryptocurrency on the compromised container.

An Ambitious Attack Scheme

Researchers said the exploit attempts to continue infecting other parts of the container network by using SSH credentials it collects along the way.

This allows cybercriminals to test an extensive number of key combinations and user account possibilities, researchers added. If successful, a shell script then places the cryptocurrency miner on the infected host.

The investigation traced the origins of the campaign to Eastern Europe, where command-and-control (C&C) servers split the various functions required to manage the attacks. While miners can be designed for many different kinds of cryptocurrencies, the target, in this case, is bitcoin, researchers said.

Although the campaign was described in the report as ambitious, researchers suggested that the rise of cloud-native environments and the increased use of containers will make more cybercriminals follow similarly sophisticated approaches.

Don’t Let Kinsing Lead to Crypto-Mining

The obvious step for anyone vulnerable to an attack is to conduct a thorough review of their container environments. This should include looking for suspicious user activity in log files and checking for any areas where least privilege settings should be, but haven’t been, enforced.

Beyond that, organizations need to recognize where container security responsibilities lie. Some areas may be dealt with by providers but others — including vulnerability management and continuous event monitoring — should be directly under the IT security team’s control.

More from

Bridging the 3.4 Million Workforce Gap in Cybersecurity

As new cybersecurity threats continue to loom, the industry is running short of workers to face them. The 2022 (ISC)2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study identified a 3.4 million worldwide cybersecurity worker gap; the total existing workforce is estimated at 4.7 million. Yet despite adding workers this past year, that gap continued to widen.Nearly 12,000 participants in that study felt that additional staff would have a hugely positive impact on their ability to perform their duties. More hires would boost proper risk…

The Evolution of Antivirus Software to Face Modern Threats

Over the years, endpoint security has evolved from primitive antivirus software to more sophisticated next-generation platforms employing advanced technology and better endpoint detection and response.  Because of the increased threat that modern cyberattacks pose, experts are exploring more elegant ways of keeping data safe from threats.Signature-Based Antivirus SoftwareSignature-based detection is the use of footprints to identify malware. All programs, applications, software and files have a digital footprint. Buried within their code, these digital footprints or signatures are unique to the respective…

How Do Threat Hunters Keep Organizations Safe?

Neil Wyler started his job amid an ongoing cyberattack. As a threat hunter, he helped his client discover that millions of records had been stolen over four months. Even though his client used sophisticated tools, its threat-hunting technology did not detect the attack because the transactions looked normal. But with Wyler’s expertise, he was able to realize that data was leaving the environment as well as entering the system. His efforts saved the company from suffering even more damage and…

The White House on Quantum Encryption and IoT Labels

A recent White House Fact Sheet outlined the current and future U.S. cybersecurity priorities. While most of the topics covered were in line with expectations, others drew more attention. The emphasis on critical infrastructure protection is clearly a top national priority. However, the plan is to create a labeling system for IoT devices, identifying the ones with the highest cybersecurity standards. Few expected that news. The topic of quantum-resistant encryption reveals that such concerns may become a reality sooner than…