October 4, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 3 min read

The new release of Mirai malware source code unleashed a wave of IoT-based bots on the internet at large, giving motivated fraudsters the tools they need to ramp up attack speeds and deliver huge distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) throughput.

InfoWorld described it as a “plague,” and it may be right, since IoT security already struggles to keep pace with cybercriminals’ sophistication and speed. Is it possible to insulate corporate networks against this new wave of IoT insecurity?

Botnet Backlash

As noted by Infosecurity Magazine, Mirai is designed to leverage IoT by scanning the web for devices protected by factory-default passwords or hard-coded credentials, making them easy to compromise and infect. Once under the control of malicious actors, these devices are turned into a kind of massive botnet that can spam-DDoS websites and quickly shut them down.

The Krebs on Security site, for example, was recently targeted by a DDoS attack using the Mirai malware reaching 620 Gbps. Ars Technica also reported a 1 Tbps attack on French web host OVH.

In both cases, this traffic is orders of magnitude greater than what is required to knock out a website. It was made possible by a combination of the sheer number of IoT devices now connected to the internet and the lackluster security associated with most of these products.

That’s with Mirai still under the control of just a few attackers. Its source code was released last Friday, according to Infosecurity Magazine, after cybercriminals noticed the number of botnets they could pull was steadily dropping thanks to ISPs “cleaning up their act.” With Mirai now available to the public, however, the sheer number of attempts may undo much of the progress made in the wake of the Krebs and OVH attacks.

When Cameras and Printers Attack

According Ars Technica, IP cameras and video recorders are among the most frequently compromised IoT devices. It makes sense, since there are millions of these devices online, and most come with stock security credentials that are never changed.

The problem is that cameras, recorders, printers and wireless sensors don’t seem like threats because they’re on the fringes of corporate networks. Even if they’re compromised, they pose no local threat. With a few tweaks, however, they can be misappropriated as part of a larger, IP-enabled botnet that can conduct DDoS attacks anywhere, anytime.

Mitigating Mirai Malware

So how do IoT suppliers and manufacturers reverse the trend and stop Mirai in its tracks? First up are passwords. Device vendors need to make sure every IoT product comes with a unique password or force users to change the password once the device is installed.

Problems here include cost — since cheaper and faster is better for companies looking to tap into the IoT market — and the specter of user inconvenience. If forced to remember yet another password or make regular changes to device security, users may opt for a simpler alternative.

There’s also the problem of firmware. Even devices that start secure don’t stay that way forever. Still, companies often make it difficult to find firmware updates. Automatic updates, meanwhile, introduce the problem of man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks if the process isn’t properly protected.

Solving IoT Insecurity

The Mirai malware release is merely a symptom of the larger problem of limited IoT security. Cybercriminals are able to create botnets because speed and convenience often trump security when it comes to IoT.

To solve the problem, security leaders must rethink the IoT industry on the whole. Rather than existing outside the corporate network, connected devices must be seen as the first line of defense: Whatever gets past the gates can be used to undermine the foundation.

More from

Cloud Threat Landscape Report: AI-generated attacks low for the cloud

2 min read - For the last couple of years, a lot of attention has been placed on the evolutionary state of artificial intelligence (AI) technology and its impact on cybersecurity. In many industries, the risks associated with AI-generated attacks are still present and concerning, especially with the global average of data breach costs increasing by 10% from last year.However, according to the most recent Cloud Threat Landscape Report released by IBM’s X-Force team, the near-term threat of an AI-generated attack targeting cloud computing…

Testing the limits of generative AI: How red teaming exposes vulnerabilities in AI models

4 min read - With generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) on the frontlines of information security, red teams play an essential role in identifying vulnerabilities that others can overlook.With the average cost of a data breach reaching an all-time high of $4.88 million in 2024, businesses need to know exactly where their vulnerabilities lie. Given the remarkable pace at which they’re adopting gen AI, there’s a good chance that some of those vulnerabilities lie in AI models themselves — or the data used to…

FBI, CISA issue warning for cross Apple-Android texting

3 min read - CISA and the FBI recently released a joint statement that the People's Republic of China (PRC) is targeting commercial telecommunications infrastructure as part of a significant cyber espionage campaign. As a result, the agencies released a joint guide, Enhanced Visibility and Hardening Guidance for Communications Infrastructure, with best practices organizations and agencies should adopt to protect against this espionage threat. According to the statement, PRC-affiliated actors compromised networks at multiple telecommunication companies. They stole customer call records data as well…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today