October 4, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 3 min read

The new release of Mirai malware source code unleashed a wave of IoT-based bots on the internet at large, giving motivated fraudsters the tools they need to ramp up attack speeds and deliver huge distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) throughput.

InfoWorld described it as a “plague,” and it may be right, since IoT security already struggles to keep pace with cybercriminals’ sophistication and speed. Is it possible to insulate corporate networks against this new wave of IoT insecurity?

Botnet Backlash

As noted by Infosecurity Magazine, Mirai is designed to leverage IoT by scanning the web for devices protected by factory-default passwords or hard-coded credentials, making them easy to compromise and infect. Once under the control of malicious actors, these devices are turned into a kind of massive botnet that can spam-DDoS websites and quickly shut them down.

The Krebs on Security site, for example, was recently targeted by a DDoS attack using the Mirai malware reaching 620 Gbps. Ars Technica also reported a 1 Tbps attack on French web host OVH.

In both cases, this traffic is orders of magnitude greater than what is required to knock out a website. It was made possible by a combination of the sheer number of IoT devices now connected to the internet and the lackluster security associated with most of these products.

That’s with Mirai still under the control of just a few attackers. Its source code was released last Friday, according to Infosecurity Magazine, after cybercriminals noticed the number of botnets they could pull was steadily dropping thanks to ISPs “cleaning up their act.” With Mirai now available to the public, however, the sheer number of attempts may undo much of the progress made in the wake of the Krebs and OVH attacks.

When Cameras and Printers Attack

According Ars Technica, IP cameras and video recorders are among the most frequently compromised IoT devices. It makes sense, since there are millions of these devices online, and most come with stock security credentials that are never changed.

The problem is that cameras, recorders, printers and wireless sensors don’t seem like threats because they’re on the fringes of corporate networks. Even if they’re compromised, they pose no local threat. With a few tweaks, however, they can be misappropriated as part of a larger, IP-enabled botnet that can conduct DDoS attacks anywhere, anytime.

Mitigating Mirai Malware

So how do IoT suppliers and manufacturers reverse the trend and stop Mirai in its tracks? First up are passwords. Device vendors need to make sure every IoT product comes with a unique password or force users to change the password once the device is installed.

Problems here include cost — since cheaper and faster is better for companies looking to tap into the IoT market — and the specter of user inconvenience. If forced to remember yet another password or make regular changes to device security, users may opt for a simpler alternative.

There’s also the problem of firmware. Even devices that start secure don’t stay that way forever. Still, companies often make it difficult to find firmware updates. Automatic updates, meanwhile, introduce the problem of man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks if the process isn’t properly protected.

Solving IoT Insecurity

The Mirai malware release is merely a symptom of the larger problem of limited IoT security. Cybercriminals are able to create botnets because speed and convenience often trump security when it comes to IoT.

To solve the problem, security leaders must rethink the IoT industry on the whole. Rather than existing outside the corporate network, connected devices must be seen as the first line of defense: Whatever gets past the gates can be used to undermine the foundation.

More from

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today