October 6, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

The reemergence of the Linux.Wifatch router virus may turn out be an unusual case of a cybercriminal working to defend consumers against other malware rather than doing any direct damage or stealing data.

Symantec researchers said Linux.Wifatch, which has also been called Zollard and Reincarna, has been active since for the last two years. Once it infects a home router, however, its main function has been to keep botnets and other threats off the device. As CSO Online reported, the virus has infiltrated networks through the same weak passwords associated with similar malware but remains fairly visible to third-party inspection and even offers code to assist with debugging.

The Verge suggested the Linux.Wifatch router virus is actually an attempt to ward off government surveillance from agencies such as the National Security Agency (NSA). Its source code, for example, includes a comment from free software advocate Richard Stallman that urges prying eyes to defend the constitutional rights of citizens. Perhaps because it hasn’t caused any trouble on its own, Symantec suggested Linux.Wifatch is widespread across tens of thousands of devices, but there has yet to be a concrete estimate.

Though its creator remains unknown, ITProPortal observed that whoever is behind Linux.Wifatch is well aware of how a home router can be used to distribute updates without the owner’s permission. There may be some altruistic motives in this case, but unless more users update their firmware and use better passwords, such holes could create security nightmares as more devices become connected via the Internet of Things (IoT).

As with any form of vigilante justice, it may be up to the public to decide they are better positioned to look after themselves. Forbes said that Linux.Wifatch primarily checks Telnet ports for suspicious activity and, if necessary, renders it inoperable. Users are usually then requested to update their router, but that’s not really the kind of safeguard the average consumer or business would want to count on.

Even if this turns out to be a white-hat virus, as International Business Times described it, router users should take the steps necessary to have it removed. Symantec researchers suggested that repeat infections are likely. Even if some of us owe Linux.Wifatch a debt of gratitude, leaving security up to those that sneak their way into devices is a sure way to wind up paying dearly later on.

More from

CVE-2023-20078 technical analysis: Identifying and triggering a command injection vulnerability in Cisco IP phones

7 min read - CVE-2023-20078 catalogs an unauthenticated command injection vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco 6800, 7800, and 8800 Series IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware installed; however, limited technical analysis is publicly available. This article presents my findings while researching this vulnerability. In the end, the reader should be equipped with the information necessary to understand and trigger this vulnerability.Vulnerability detailsThe following Cisco Security Advisory (Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, and 8800 Series Web UI Vulnerabilities - Cisco) details CVE-2023-20078 and…

X-Force data reveals top spam trends, campaigns and senior superlatives in 2023

10 min read - The 2024 IBM X-Force Threat Intelligence Index revealed attackers continued to pivot to evade detection to deliver their malware in 2023. The good news? Security improvements, such as Microsoft blocking macro execution by default starting in 2022 and OneNote embedded files with potentially dangerous extensions by mid-2023, have changed the threat landscape for the better. Improved endpoint detection also likely forced attackers to shift away from other techniques prominent in 2022, such as using disk image files (e.g. ISO) and…

The compelling need for cloud-native data protection

4 min read - Cloud environments were frequent targets for cyber attackers in 2023. Eighty-two percent of breaches that involved data stored in the cloud were in public, private or multi-cloud environments. Attackers gained the most access to multi-cloud environments, with 39% of breaches spanning multi-cloud environments because of the more complicated security issues. The cost of these cloud breaches totaled $4.75 million, higher than the average cost of $4.45 million for all data breaches.The reason for this high cost is not only the…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today