Manufacturers have long used and abused bundling software to collect placement fees from software marketers. Implicit in the bundling is the belief that the software will be beneficial to the user in some way — or at least cause them no obvious harm. But there have always been potentially unwanted programs (PUPs) in the mix.

These days, this practice is under critical review by security experts who are concerned that it may provide a vector for attackers. If a bundle includes software that eschews security best practices, cybercriminals might be able to exploit the weak spots.

A Full-Barrelled Assault

Things have gotten out of hand. According to Bleeping Computer, this type of mutant adware/malware installs backdoors and rootkits. It then employs persistence techniques to make the programs very difficult to remove.

Even Microsoft wants to zap some of these PUPs. Softpedia reported that the tech giant decided to add the SupTab, Sasquor and Ghokswa PUPs to its Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT) recently.

PUPs can amount to full-barrelled assaults on a user. Combine this with the security implications of using unaudited and untrusted software, and you have a real problem.

Redefining Potentially Unwanted Programs

Malwarebytes has had enough. The cybersecurity research firm is changing its internal definition of PUPs, extending the parameters in functional and far more exclusionary ways. It is sure to meet vendor resistance.

That resistance can even take legal form. Let’s say a PUP vendor crams a useless program into a bundler. The end-user license agreement (EULA) might allow the vendor to sue anyone who calls the software malicious or identifies it as PUP-related malware. Producers have bitten the ankles of past security product creators this way.

According to the Malwarebytes blog, the firm received “a mountain of letters with legal letterheads demanding that we stop. Now some people might think of this as something that would slow us down, but we see it as proof that we are making a dent in the development and distribution of PUPs.” Sounds like the experts aren’t giving up so easily.

Unfortunately, it seems that PUP pushers are only shut down when victims come forward and sue the vendors themselves.

More from

Will the 2.5M Records Breach Impact Student Loan Relief?

Over 2.5 million student loan accounts were breached in the summer of 2022, according to a recent Maine Attorney General data breach notification. The target of the breach was Nelnet Servicing, a servicing system and web portal provider for the Oklahoma Student Loan Authority (OSLA) and EdFinancial. An investigation determined that intruders accessed student loan account registration information between June and July 2022. The stolen data includes names, addresses, emails, phone numbers and social security numbers for 2,501,324 student loan…

Containers, Security, and Risks within Containerized Environments

Applications have historically been deployed and created in a manner reminiscent of classic shopping malls. First, a developer builds the mall, then creates the various stores inside. The stores conform to the dimensions of the mall and operate within its floor plan. In older approaches to application development, a developer would have a targeted system or set of systems for which they intend to create an application. This targeted system would be the mall. Then, when building the application, they would…

Inside the Second White House Ransomware Summit

Ransomware is a growing, international threat. It's also an insidious one. The state of the art in ransomware is simple but effective. Well-organized criminal gangs hiding in safe-haven countries breach an organization, find, steal and encrypt important files. Then they present victims with the double incentive that, should they refuse to pay, their encrypted files will be both deleted and made public. In addition to hundreds of major attacks around the world, two critical ransomware incidents — the Colonial Pipeline…

Did Brazil DSL Modem Attacks Change Device Security?

From 2011 to 2012, millions of Internet users in Brazil fell victim to a massive attack against vulnerable DSL modems. By configuring the modems remotely, attackers could redirect users to malicious domain name system (DNS) servers. Victims trying to visit popular websites (Google, Facebook) were instead directed to imposter sites. These rogue sites then installed malware on victims' computers. According to a report from Kaspersky Lab Expert Fabio Assolini citing statistics from Brazil's Computer Emergency Response Team, the attack ultimately…