New trends in malware are always a hot security topic, with experts trying to predict what might come next and determine how companies can best protect their assets. It’s unlikely, however, that anyone saw this coming: The author of the file-encrypting Locker ransomware has publicly apologized and provided the free decryption keys for any compromised files. While there’s no word on why the cybercriminal had a change of heart and decided to own up, it’s certainly an interesting security development. Has malware finally become so ubiquitous that to stay relevant malicious actors must display some kind of conscience?

Rise and Shine With Locker Ransomware

As noted by Network World, the Locker ransomware was a so-called “sleeper,” which lays dormant on user systems for weeks or even months after being offloaded by a Trojan.Downloader. On May 25, a command was sent to install Locker on all affected computers and then started scanning for files to encrypt — everything from .doc to .ppt, .jpg to .raw. Removable drives were also scanned and encrypted.

Once encryption was complete, users received a message saying that their files were no longer accessible; their return cost 0.1 bitcoin (around $24), which increased to 1 bitcoin after 72 hours. But on May 30, a post was made on Pastebin by “Poka BrightMinds,” stating that he or she authored the malware and was “very sorry about what happened.” The post claimed the malware was never intended for release, that all new infections had stopped and that on June 2 at midnight, all infected computers would be automatically decrypted — and that’s exactly what happened. But security researchers are now left wondering why.

Compassionate Criminal?

There are several lines of speculation when it comes to the Locker ransomware turnaround. Some experts suggested that the author had made enough money from the efforts and decided to quit while ahead, or that the creator ran afoul of law enforcement. CEO of KnowBe4 Stu Sjouwerman suggested the attack didn’t have the hallmarks of “an experienced cybercriminal” and postulated that the author might have been affiliated with an organized crime outfit, decided to go solo and then had the plan backfire.

The malware itself is a little more forgiving than similar encryption attacks. For instance, on the splash screen displayed after files are locked down, Locker stated that “you can still safely use your computer, no new files will be encrypted and no malware will be installed,” according to a post on KnowBe4. The author also told the truth about decryption: Infected computers were cleared, and keys were also provided for users who had already cleared the infection but still had locked files. The act and apology weren’t entirely noble, however, since the creator didn’t offer to return any stolen bitcoins, and it’s hard to believe that this kind of sleeper malware was simply designed as a thought experiment. There’s also the disturbing notion that the apology itself may be yet another trick. Did the automatic decrypt leave anything else behind? Perhaps another, even more subtle piece of malware?

Apparently, malware creators are human, too, and can suffer attacks of conscience. In the case of the Locker ransomware, users had files returned and computers cleared but were still out any bitcoins. Perhaps this marks the dawning of a “compassionate criminal” era in malware development — but apology or not, it comes with a cost.

More from

Detecting Insider Threats: Leverage User Behavior Analytics

3 min read - Employees often play an unwitting role in many security incidents, from accidental data breaches to intentional malicious attacks. Unfortunately, most organizations don’t have the right protocols and processes to identify potential risks posed by their workforce. Based on a survey conducted by SANS Institute, 35% of respondents said they lack visibility into insider threats, while 30% said the inability to audit user access is a security blind spot in their organizations. In addition, the 2023 X-Force Threat Intelligence Index reported that…

3 min read

Poor Communication During a Data Breach Can Cost You — Here’s How to Avoid It

5 min read - No one needs to tell you that data breaches are costly. That data has been quantified and the numbers are staggering. In fact, the IBM Security Cost of a Data Breach estimates that the average cost of a data breach in 2022 was $4.35 million, with 83% of organizations experiencing one or more security incidents. But what’s talked about less often (and we think should be talked about more) is how communication — both good and bad — factors into…

5 min read

Increasingly Sophisticated Cyberattacks Target Healthcare

4 min read - It’s rare to see 100% agreement on a survey. But Porter Research found consensus from business leaders across the provider, payer and pharmaceutical/life sciences industries. Every single person agreed that “growing hacker sophistication” is the primary driver behind the increase in ransomware attacks. In response to the findings, the American Hospital Association told Porter Research, “Not only are cyber criminals more organized than they were in the past, but they are often more skilled and sophisticated.” Although not unanimous, the…

4 min read

Ransomware Renaissance 2023: The Definitive Guide to Stay Safer

2 min read - Ransomware is experiencing a renaissance in 2023, with some cybersecurity firms reporting over 400 attacks in the month of March alone. And it shouldn’t be a surprise: the 2023 X-Force Threat Intelligence Index found backdoor deployments — malware providing remote access — as the top attacker action in 2022, and aptly predicted 2022’s backdoor failures would become 2023’s ransomware crisis. Compounding the problem is the industrialization of the cybercrime ecosystem, enabling adversaries to complete more attacks, faster. Over the last…

2 min read