July 7, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Microsoft wants new standards for the cybersecurity world, a vision proposed in its recently published paper “From Articulation to Implementation: Enabling Progress on Cybersecurity Norms.”

Overall, the Microsoft cybersecurity viewpoint emphasizes the need for a consensus across the industry. Specifically, the company wants to establish norms regarding the effective disclosure of security issues as well as methods to deal with the attribution of hostile acts directed at software.

The subject is a worthy topic to be considered. Without this kind of industry agreement in place, responses to cybersecurity incidents can be wild, misdirected and unproductive. But others have their own ideas on these specific details.

Responsible Versus Full Disclosure

Historically, two different camps have been split on how to handle vulnerability disclosure: responsible disclosure and full disclosure. Responsible disclosure, which involves disclosing to the vendor only, contends that immediate and full disclosure gives attackers the ability to develop successful exploits before the vendor has a chance to fix the flaw.

When zero-day vulnerabilities are discovered, there is usually a cry for an immediate patch. If the manufacturer cannot deliver a patch, someone else may be able to do so — but only if all details of the problem are disclosed to them. It also lights a fire under the manufacturer to produce the patch and save face with the public.

Full disclosure will expose the user, however. Disclosing the vulnerability without a patch ready to be applied means that hostile actors could figure out a way to exploit the flaw.

Microsoft Cybersecurity Pushes for a Coordinated Response

What Microsoft wants is a “coordinated disclosure” approach. This is a variant of responsible disclosure that also allows disclosure to computer emergency response teams (CERTs) along with the vendor. The company believes that public disclosure should only happen after a patch has been issued and believes this should be the new cybersecurity norm.

Microsoft also felt there should be offensive norms and defensive norms that vary depending on the situation and the parties involved.

But Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab, may have identified a problem with trying to establish any norms. He told SecurityWeek that “the whole concept of norms assumes that they relate to some homogeneous body guided by the same basic principles. That clearly isn’t so in cyberspace.”

It remains to be seen if even the gargantuan efforts that Microsoft is capable of will bear fruit in this area.

More from

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Communication platforms play a major role in data breach risks

4 min read - Every online activity or task brings at least some level of cybersecurity risk, but some have more risk than others. Kiteworks Sensitive Content Communications Report found that this is especially true when it comes to using communication tools.When it comes to cybersecurity, communicating means more than just talking to another person; it includes any activity where you are transferring data from one point online to another. Companies use a wide range of different types of tools to communicate, including email,…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today