September 28, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Over 20 popular stock trading apps contain flaws that could expose users and lead to stolen money or lost personal data, according to research from IOActive.

Alejandro Hernandez, a senior security consultant for IOActive, posted the results of his examination of 21 of the most popular mobile stock trading apps. These apps process billions of dollars in transactions per year and are used by millions of people worldwide.

In total, Hernandez sent disclosures to 13 private brokerage firms. As Threatpost summarized, the response was not encouraging: Only two firms acknowledged the reports. Because there are no fixes currently available, IOActive has yet to name the specific apps tested.

Types of Problems in Stock Trading Apps

Hernandez tested security controls and found that 19 percent of the 21 apps exposed user passwords in cleartext. Without encryption enabled, a threat actor who managed to get physical access to a device could devastate an account.

Not only that, but 62 percent of apps were found to directly send important financial data to log files and systems. In this transmission effort, Hernandez found that 67 percent of data was stored at rest in an unencrypted fashion. Physical access to the device would be necessary to extract this information.

Two of the apps used an unencrypted HTTP channel for transmission and reception of data in motion. But even encrypted channels were not secure — 13 of the 19 apps using HTTPS did not check the authenticity of the remote server via a method such as certificate pinning. This means that if a threat actor could install a malicious SSL certificate, it would put the actor in a position to launch a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack.

Threatpost observed that this same lack of certificate checking could allow MitM situations if the attacker is in control of a public Wi-Fi router or the hub at an internet service provider (ISP). Cybercriminals could impersonate the back end of the transaction.

XSS Is Probable

Malicious JavaScript or HTML could also be injected due to this lack of certificate verification. Hernandez found that 10 apps were configured to execute JavaScript code in web views, and as a result common cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks were possible. Stealing credentials with phony forms would be one example of this sort of attack.

In the IOActive post, Hernandez recommended that “regulators should develop trading-specific guidelines to be followed by the brokerage firms and fintech companies in charge of creating trading software,” which would deal with the seemingly underappreciated financial harm that these kinds of apps can cause.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today