May 17, 2018 By David Bisson 2 min read


The majority of risk assessments examined in a recent insider threat report spotted users who tried to bypass their employer’s security measures using private or anonymous browsing.

Researchers analyzed user threat assessments performed on customers and prospective clients across the globe and found that 60 percent identified such behavior. These analyses provided insight into the types of user actions that put enterprise data at the greatest risk.

Risk Assessments Identify Insider Threats

The report identified malicious users as a “traditional” type of insider threat. After analyzing multiple types of activity, the researchers singled out attempts to bypass company security as the most reliable way to confirm that a user action is malicious.

Other indicators of bad intent included employees’ use of “high-risk applications,” such as PowerShell and uTorrent, and the use of the web for inappropriate purposes, such as gaming and gambling. These factors came in at 72 percent and 67 percent of risk assessments, respectively, according to Dtex Systems’ “2018 Insider Threat Intelligence Report.”

Even so, the security firm noted that negligent insiders tend to be far more common than malicious ones. The authors explained that this type of negligence-based incident can take the form of users downloading risky applications or pirated media due to lack of security awareness. The report also found that companies themselves can create insider threats by leaving data publicly exposed in the cloud (78 percent of risk assessments) or transferring data to unencrypted USB devices (90 percent of risk assessments).

Spotting Risky Behavior

Dtex CEO Christy Wyatt offered some advice to help organizations protect themselves against insider threats.

“Organizations have to secure data, neutralize risky behaviors, and protect trusted employees against attacks and their own errors,” she said. “To accomplish all of this, they have to see how their people are behaving and have a mechanism that provides alerts when things are go wrong.”

Consistent with Wyatt’s advice, the authors of the report advised organizations to create a defense-in-depth strategy that emphasizes visibility into suspicious actions, such as when employees take their devices off the corporate network.

More from

Unified endpoint management for purpose-based devices

4 min read - As purpose-built devices become increasingly common, the challenges associated with their unique management and security needs are becoming clear. What are purpose-built devices? Most fall under the category of rugged IoT devices typically used outside of an office environment and which often run on a different operating system than typical office devices. Examples include ruggedized tablets and smartphones, handheld scanners and kiosks. Many different industries are utilizing purpose-built devices, including travel and transportation, retail, warehouse and distribution, manufacturing (including automotive)…

Stealthy WailingCrab Malware misuses MQTT Messaging Protocol

14 min read - This article was made possible thanks to the hard work of writer Charlotte Hammond and contributions from Ole Villadsen and Kat Metrick. IBM X-Force researchers have been tracking developments to the WailingCrab malware family, in particular, those relating to its C2 communication mechanisms, which include misusing the Internet-of-Things (IoT) messaging protocol MQTT. WailingCrab, also known as WikiLoader, is a sophisticated, multi-component malware delivered almost exclusively by an initial access broker that X-Force tracks as Hive0133, which overlaps with TA544. WailingCrab…

Operationalize cyber risk quantification for smart security

4 min read - Organizations constantly face new tactics from cyber criminals who aim to compromise their most valuable assets. Yet despite evolving techniques, many security leaders still rely on subjective terms, such as low, medium and high, to communicate and manage cyber risk. These vague terms do not convey the necessary detail or insight to produce actionable outcomes that accurately identify, measure, manage and communicate cyber risks. As a result, executives and board members remain uninformed and ill-prepared to manage organizational risk effectively.…

Pentesting vs. Pentesting as a Service: Which is better?

5 min read - In today's quickly evolving cybersecurity landscape, organizations constantly seek the most effective ways to secure their digital assets. Penetration testing (pentesting) has emerged as a leading solution for identifying potential system vulnerabilities while closing security gaps that can lead to an attack. At the same time, a newer entrant into the security arena is Pentesting as a Service (PTaaS). Although PTaaS shares some similarities with pentesting, distinct differences make them two separate solutions. This article will discuss how these methodologies…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today