It’s one of the most popular browsers in the world, and people expect to be safe — so why wouldn’t Mozilla want to increase the rewards in its bug bounty program for Firefox to $10,000?

According to the details available online, Mozilla’s rules are much like those of other bug bounty programs, which insist that those reporting problems are not the ones causing them, the issue involves remote exploits and that it be a new issue the company hasn’t yet seen. An internal committee reviews all submissions, and awards are distributed at its discretion.

Mozilla may be tweaking its rewards in part to keep up with competitors such as Microsoft, which raised the top tier of compensation of its own bug bounty program to a maximum of $15,000 a few months ago. A spokesperson at Mozilla told ZDNet the increases were long overdue and represent a 70 percent increase over what was offered a handful of years ago. That said, getting to the $10,000 mark will mean bringing forward an extremely high-risk threat to Firefox, though there are also some rewards for bugs deemed “moderate.”

The concept of a bug bounty program is becoming standard business practice, Threatpost suggested, because it offers a way of crowdsourcing IT security analysis. The alternative is to rely solely on in-house resources, which can be expensive, or simply responding to flaws after they are reported by customers who have experienced a problem. Obviously, the potential cost for the latter scenario is incalculable, and the wide use of browsers in particular make them a popular target for cybercriminals.

In some respects, of course, the most important aspects of a bug bounty program is the follow-through. As The Register pointed out, cybercriminals have a history of taking advantage of software flaws that aren’t properly patched. Besides having consistent and transparent guidelines for a program, there should be some sense of how quickly bugs will be dealt with by the company involved. For example, a few months ago a security researcher published a blog post stating that, despite its well-known bug bounty program, eBay had left a cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw unresolved for more than a year after it was first reported.

Besides offering more cash, Mozilla will differentiate itself by showing it can be a lot quicker to get bugs fixed. Raising the stakes of threat reporting should also motivate security professionals to dig a little deeper to find vulnerabilities within a system, meaning fewer running flaws and a more solid end product for Mozilla and Firefox users — hopefully.

More from

Data Privacy: How the Growing Field of Regulations Impacts Businesses

The proposed rules over artificial intelligence (AI) in the European Union (EU) are a harbinger of things to come. Data privacy laws are becoming more complex and growing in number and relevance. So, businesses that seek to become — and stay — compliant must find a solution that can do more than just respond to current challenges. Take a look at upcoming trends when it comes to data privacy regulations and how to follow them. Today's AI Solutions On April…

Why Zero Trust Works When Everything Else Doesn’t

The zero trust security model is proving to be one of the most effective cybersecurity approaches ever conceived. Zero trust — also called zero trust architecture (ZTA), zero trust network architecture (ZTNA) and perimeter-less security — takes a "default deny" security posture. All people and devices must prove explicit permission to use each network resource each time they use that resource. Using microsegmentation and least privileged access principles, zero trust not only prevents breaches but also stymies lateral movement should a breach…

5 Golden Rules of Threat Hunting

When a breach is uncovered, the operational cadence includes threat detection, quarantine and termination. While all stages can occur within the first hour of discovery, in some cases, that's already too late.Security operations center (SOC) teams monitor and hunt new threats continuously. To ward off the most advanced threats, security teams proactively hunt for ones that evade the dashboards of their security solutions.However, advanced threat actors have learned to blend in with their target's environment, remaining unnoticed for prolonged periods. Based…

Third-Party App Stores Could Be a Red Flag for iOS Security

Even Apple can’t escape change forever. The famously restrictive company will allow third-party app stores for iOS devices, along with allowing users to “sideload” software directly. Spurring the move is the European Union’s (EU) Digital Markets Act (DMA), which looks to ensure open markets by reducing the ability of digital “gatekeepers” to restrict content on devices. While this is good news for app creators and end-users, there is a potential red flag: security. Here’s what the compliance-driven change means for…