April 6, 2018 By David Bisson 2 min read

Nearly half of organizations that suffered a “significant” digital attack fell victim to bad actors again within a year’s time, a new security trends report revealed.

According to Mandiant’s “M-Trends 2018” report, 49 percent of managed detection and response customers that remediated a large-scale attack suffered an incident from the same or a similarly motivated threat group within one year. The initial assaults consisted of data theft, credential harvesting and spear phishing, among other techniques.

Unpacking Repeat Cyberattack Trends

Mandiant admitted to not having looked at recompromise figures since it released its “M-Trends 2013” study five years ago. That report found that 38 percent of clients had suffered another attack after successful remediation.

The number of follow-up attacks were somewhat higher in 2017: 56 percent of customers weathered at least one significant attack from the same threat group or one like it. At the same time, the vast majority (86 percent) of organizations that remediated more than one significant cyberattack hosted more than one unique bad actor in their IT environment.

Some regional differences were apparent over the course of the year. Less than half of customers in the Americas and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) experienced another attack of consequence and/or multiple threat actors. By contrast, 91 percent of Asia-Pacific (APAC) clients dealt with a subsequent campaign, while 82 percent of organizations from that region suffered a significant attack from multiple groups.

The Good News and Bad News About Dwell Time

Dwell time, or the average number of days during which attackers lurked in a victim’s network prior to detection, increased across several regions in 2017, according to the report. The APAC average increased nearly three times, from 172 days to 489 days. The EMEA dwell time growth was more modest at 40 percent, from 106 days to 175 days.

Stuart McKenzie, vice president of Mandiant at FireEye, expressed disappointment in the growth of the median EMEA dwell time but noted that it’s not all bad news.

“On the positive side, we’ve seen a growing number of historic threats uncovered this year that have been active for several hundred days,” McKenzie said, as quoted by Infosecurity Magazine. “Detecting these long-lasting attacks is obviously a positive development, but it increases the dwell time statistic.”

During the same survey period, the dwell time for the Americas decreased from 99 days to 75.5 days. The average across all regions rose slightly from 99 days to 101 days.

Looking Ahead

In the report, Mandiant shared its prediction that foreign digital espionage groups will continue to prey upon U.S. companies and service providers in 2017. It also predicted that bad actors will target the software supply chain to spy on developers and software-makers over the course of the year.

More from

Exploring the 2024 Worldwide Managed Detection and Response Vendor Assessment

3 min read - Research firm IDC recently released its 2024 Worldwide Managed Detection and Response Vendor Assessment, which both highlights leaders in the market and examines the evolution of MDR as a critical component of IT security infrastructure. Here are the key takeaways. The current state of MDR According to the assessment, “the MDR market has evolved extensively over the past couple of years. This should be seen as a positive movement as MDR providers have had to evolve to meet the growing…

Regulatory harmonization in OT-critical infrastructure faces hurdles

3 min read - In an effort to enhance cyber resilience across critical infrastructure, the Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) has recently released a summary of feedback from its 2023 Cybersecurity Regulatory Harmonization Request for Information (RFI). The responses reveal major concerns from critical infrastructure industries related to operational technology (OT), such as energy, transport and manufacturing. Their worries include the current fragmented regulatory landscape and difficulty adapting to new cyber regulations. The frustration appears to be unanimous. Meanwhile, the magnitude of…

Generative AI security requires a solid framework

4 min read - How many companies intentionally refuse to use AI to get their work done faster and more efficiently? Probably none: the advantages of AI are too great to deny.The benefits AI models offer to organizations are undeniable, especially for optimizing critical operations and outputs. However, generative AI also comes with risk. According to the IBM Institute for Business Value, 96% of executives say adopting generative AI makes a security breach likely in their organization within the next three years.CISA Director Jen…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today