No one ever said using torrent services was safe. Downloaders may run afoul of law enforcement, spyware or malware and in many cases don’t end up with the file they wanted in the first place. And at the recent USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies, a team of researchers rolled out a new risk: multiple BitTorrent-based distributed reflective denial-of-service (DRDoS) attacks, some of which can’t be defeated using standard defenses.

Amplified Aggravation

Most users are familiar with DDoS attacks. Malicious actors flood network connections with traffic in hopes of overwhelming bandwidth allowances and causing websites to crash. But companies are getting better at defending against these attacks since they often come with familiar precursors that allow IT admins to take proactive action.

DRDoS, meanwhile, is a subtler animal. It works like this: Attackers spoof source IP addresses and then send small packets of data to known amplifiers. These amplifiers expand received packets and send them back; large enough volumes can overwhelm even high-performance systems. As noted by SecurityWeek, reflective attacks have been clocked at 400 gigabytes per second.

Using amplifiers lets attackers do less work for a greater payoff, do it all from a single machine and lower the chance they’ll be caught in the act since most of the heavy lifting is done by the amplifier itself. What’s more, these amplifiers aren’t hard to find; as more cybercriminals use them, they become easier to access online.

Torrent Troubles and DRDoS

So how does this tie in with BitTorrent streaming? Most torrent systems use UDP protocols, which aren’t designed to prevent IP spoofing. And with so many connections providing data simultaneously to user devices, the attack surface is huge — multiple reflective attacks could overwhelm even the most resilient systems. According to ExtremeTech, torrent clients such as BitTorrent Sync (BYSync) and µTorrent are vulnerable, along with popular services Vuse and Mainline. Amplification factors of up to 50 have been observed in BitTorrent official clients and 120 for BTSync.

The research team identified three risky protocols: Micro Transport Protocol (µTP), Distributed Hash Table (DHT) and Message Stream Encryption (MSE). DHT attacks that leverage DNS spoofing or network time protocol (NTP) for reflection are the easiest to defeat using a stateful packet inspection (SPI) firewall since these attack vectors leverage known ports.

As noted by Threatpost, however, handling µTP DRDoS attacks is more difficult because “TP establishes a connection with a two-way handshake. This allows an attacker to establish a connection with an amplifier using a spoofed IP address, as the receiver does not check whether the initiator has received the acknowledgment.” Normal firewalls won’t detect this kind of attack, meaning users will need to implement deep packet inspection (DPI). And when it comes to MSE, things get even more difficult since the protocol relies on a random handshake. Right now, there’s no working countermeasure to MSE-based DRDoS attacks.

The simple answer here? Don’t torrent. But the aggregate model has merit when it comes to download speed and reliability. Users need to decide if the risk of amplified attacks is worth the benefit of BitTorrent.

More from

Patch Tuesday -> Exploit Wednesday: Pwning Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (afd.sys) in 24 Hours

‘Patch Tuesday, Exploit Wednesday’ is an old hacker adage that refers to the weaponization of vulnerabilities the day after monthly security patches become publicly available. As security improves and exploit mitigations become more sophisticated, the amount of research and development required to craft a weaponized exploit has increased. This is especially relevant for memory corruption vulnerabilities. Figure 1 — Exploitation timeline However, with the addition of new features (and memory-unsafe C code) in the Windows 11 kernel, ripe new attack…

OneNote, Many Problems? The New Phishing Framework

There are plenty of phish in the digital sea, and attackers are constantly looking for new bait that helps them bypass security perimeters and land in user inboxes. Their newest hook? OneNote documents. First noticed in December 2022, this phishing framework has seen success in fooling multiple antivirus (AV) tools by using .one file extensions, and January 2023 saw an attack uptick as compromises continued. While this novel notes approach will eventually be phased out as phishing defenses catch up,…

When the Absence of Noise Becomes Signal: Defensive Considerations for Lazarus FudModule

In February 2023, X-Force posted a blog entitled “Direct Kernel Object Manipulation (DKOM) Attacks on ETW Providers” that details the capabilities of a sample attributed to the Lazarus group leveraged to impair visibility of the malware’s operations. This blog will not rehash analysis of the Lazarus malware sample or Event Tracing for Windows (ETW) as that has been previously covered in the X-Force blog post. This blog will focus on highlighting the opportunities for detection of the FudModule within the…

LastPass Breaches Cast Doubt on Password Manager Safety

In 2022, LastPass suffered a string of security breaches which sparked concern among cyber professionals and those impacted by the intrusions. Some called into question the way LastPass handled and responded to the incident. In addition, the situation ignited a wider conversation about the risks linked to utilizing password managers. A password manager helps users generate strong passwords and safeguards them within a digital locker. A master password secures all data, which enables users to conveniently access all their passwords…