January 16, 2018 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Two U.S. senators recently proposed a cybersecurity legislation that will allow the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to penalize credit rating industry organizations that don’t properly safeguard data.

Cybersecurity Legislation Imposes Penalties for Breaches

In a public statement outlining the proposed Data Breach Prevention and Compensation Act, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) explained that the bill would create a new office at the FTC focused on information protection.

If passed, it would enact strict penalties for breaches in customer data. Specifically, credit rating agencies would receive $100 fines for each piece of personally identifiable information (PII) lost in a data breach, plus $50 for each additional PII file per customer. According to SecurityWeek, the bill also requires agencies that fail to comply to pay a maximum penalty of 50 percent their gross revenue from the year before the incident took place.

In addition to giving the FTC greater oversight and power over data protection practices, this cybersecurity legislation actually hits harder in terms of fines than the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). While many firms are bracing for GDPR to come into effect later this year, it’s clear that recent security headlines are creating just as much concern among lawmakers on this side of the Atlantic.

Protecting Consumer Data

The bill aims to ensure that consumers, whose personal information becomes the ultimate casualty when cybercriminals break into large corporate systems, will be fairly compensated: 50 percent of the fines collected by the FTC would go to the victims. The other half would go toward security research and inspections, SecurityWeek noted, ensuring that the law would also reduce the risk of similar occurrences in the future.

It’s not unusual for modern governments to consider cybersecurity legislation. Just as credit agencies keep a close eye on how consumers spend their money, the government wants to keep an even closer eye on how these firms are keeping data from prying eyes.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today