September 10, 2019 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

A new strain of the Glupteba malware is cashing in on bitcoin transactions to continually update command-and-control (C&C) servers.

Discovered in 2011, the Glupteba Trojan has been used in multiple exploit kit attacks. Now, Trend Micro has identified a new strain that contains a browser stealer for sensitive data and a routine exploiter for MikroTik routers via the CVE-2018-14847 vulnerability. This version also contains a unique approach to updating its C&C servers: bitcoin transactions.

Using Blockchain to Update C&C Servers

Cutting links to C&C servers is an effective way to blunt the impact of malware infections. If malicious code strains can’t connect with data destinations, they often suspend operations or are rendered inert. As noted by The Next Web, however, the latest strain of Glupteba malware takes a new approach to continual connection by leveraging blockchain.

First, attackers use the Electrum bitcoin wallet to complete small transactions. These transactions include OP_RETURN data that contains encrypted C&C domain information. When Glupteba is activated on compromised devices, it uses a hardcoded ScriptHash string to seek out and decrypt this return data. This technique allows cybercriminals to sidestep typical security measures. If server links are severed, attackers simply make another bitcoin transaction to supply malware with a fresh C&C address.

A Range of Malicious Capabilities

While strains of Glupteba were often found as part of exploit kits, Bleeping Computer pointed out that the newest version relies on malvertising to force a dropper download and flood targets with multiple malware variants that enable malicious actors to download and execute files, take screenshots, compromise routers and turn infected devices into XMR mining machines.

In addition, the malware attempts to gain increased control over device functions by elevating privileges via the fodhelper method — fodhelper.exe naturally runs with high integrity, allowing attackers to bypass User Account Control (UAC) using custom registry entries — or identifying itself as a SYSTEM user by using stolen winlogon process tokens.

Breaking the Chain

Malicious emails and links are the top infection vector for malware threats such as Glupteba. Regular router patching is critical to avoid CVE-2018-14847 and similar vulnerabilities.

When it comes to the use of blockchain to deliver C&C addresses, IBM experts note that its nature — blockchain is code, and code can be flawed — combined with a dearth of industry expertise opens potential avenues of compromise. Breaking the chain demands both broad cloud security controls to manage transactions at scale and specific user identity oversight to limit the risk of accidental exposure.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today