How do black-hat hackers make money from their zero-day exploits?

One method is to come up with some sort of wrapper code that would deliver it. The Angler rootkit, for example, has a history of doing this; last year, it introduced four zero-days as a part of its offering while still constantly refreshing its list of new exploits.

But markets change, and now zero-days will be sold for a profit. Some cybercriminals covet them for their own use, and some brokers will facilitate such a trade.

The Hacking Team decided to test this process. Afterward, Vlad Tsyrklevich conducted an analysis of the emails between the parties, which indicated a high level of distrust between them. It seems that the cybercriminals fear being cheated and as a result won’t often sell their exploits on the underground.

Selling the Exploit

When Trustwave’s SpiderLabs found a zero-day exploit being offered inside a Russian cybercriminal forum, it came as a surprise. The forum in question is usually used as a collaboration platform “where one can hire malware coders, lease an exploit kit, buy web shells for compromised websites or even rent a whole botnet for any purpose,” Trustwave SpiderLabs said.

“However, finding a zero day listed in between these fairly common offerings is definitely an anomaly.”

According to the seller, the zero-day in question is a local privilege escalation (LPE) that works on all current versions of the Windows operating system. It was put on sale at prices above $95,000 and was later reduced to $90,000.

Trustwave asserted it cannot vouch for the claims. While the offer may look real, there’s no foolproof way to guarantee it unless they purchase the exploit — or stumble across it in the wild.

Mitigating the Zero-Day Risk

SpiderLabs offered three thoughts on reducing the risk of zero-day attacks.

First, it advised organizations to keep software up to date. LPE is one component of a successful compromise. For example, your machine may not be patched against the zero-day LPE, but it could be protected against the second portion of an attack.

Second, make sure you have a comprehensive security program that eliminates gaps. Finally, use common sense. Don’t click on unknown links or attachments, and train your employees so they do the same.

The possibility of a zero-day exploit is always there. Someone will always find a way around security. It’s up to the end user to stay safe.

More from

Emotional Blowback: Dealing With Post-Incident Stress

Cyberattacks are on the rise as adversaries find new ways of creating chaos and increasing profits. Attacks evolve constantly and often involve real-world consequences. The growing criminal Software-as-a-Service enterprise puts ready-made tools in the hands of threat actors who can use them against the software supply chain and other critical systems. And then there's the threat of nation-state attacks, with major incidents reported every month and no sign of them slowing. Amidst these growing concerns, cybersecurity professionals continue to report…

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Why Operational Technology Security Cannot Be Avoided

Operational technology (OT) includes any hardware and software that directly monitors and controls industrial equipment and all its assets, processes and events to detect or initiate a change. Yet despite occupying a critical role in a large number of essential industries, OT security is also uniquely vulnerable to attack. From power grids to nuclear plants, attacks on OT systems have caused devastating work interruptions and physical damage in industries across the globe. In fact, cyberattacks with OT targets have substantially…

Resilient Companies Have a Disaster Recovery Plan

Historically, disaster recovery (DR) planning focused on protection against unlikely events such as fires, floods and natural disasters. Some companies mistakenly view DR as an insurance policy for which the likelihood of a claim is low. With the current financial and economic pressures, cutting or underfunding DR planning is a tempting prospect for many organizations. That impulse could be costly. Unfortunately, many companies have adopted newer technology delivery models without DR in mind, such as Cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)…