Researchers have found evidence that the financially focused Cobalt cybercriminal group exploited a 17-year-old Microsoft Office cybersecurity vulnerability (CVE-2017-11882) in its latest campaign. The vulnerability, which comes from Office’s Equation Editor, allows buffer overflows to be created when the editor is fed specially crafted files. These can then lead to remote code execution.
Microsoft patched the vulnerability in November. However, the manner in which it was patched led some to believe that the original Equation Editor code was not available to the coders building the patch.
How the Cybersecurity Vulnerability Gets Exploited
In any case, it didn’t take long for someone to try to exploit the vulnerability. There were proof-of-concept exploits released just after the vulnerability was discovered, so it was just a matter of time until some fast-acting cybercriminal tried it in the wild.
ReversingLabs found a rich text format (RTF) document that was set up just to exploit this cybersecurity vulnerability. The file would contact a remote server for a first-stage payload and then execute it. This first-stage executable then connected to the remote server and obtains a second-stage payload.
The second-stage payload is a script that contains an embedded, final payload, which is the Cobalt Strike backdoor. This comes in 32-bit or 64-bit DLL form depending on the victim’s system architecture and is what allows the Cobalt group to execute its own code on the system.
Cobalt Has a History
Cobalt has been on the radar since 2016. The group typically focuses its attacks on financial targets such as banks, exchanges, insurance companies and investment funds.
In the past, Cobalt has used phishing emails to distribute its malware to victims. A poisoned RTF file used as an infection method is within the boundaries of how the group usually functions.
The group has been best known for executing attacks on Eastern Europe as well as Central and Southeast Asia locations, but have now expanded to attacks all over the world.
Once again, the age-old advice against opening unverified attachments to messages from unknown senders serves as a potent defense against these kinds of attacks.