June 1, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Israel-based security firm SafeBreach conducted an extensive analysis of covert data exfiltration to come up with what they believe is the perfect technique.

In 2015, the researchers began to focus on getting small amounts of sensitive data such as cryptographic keys or passwords from highly secure organizations. They recently presented the results in Amsterdam at the Hack in the Box Conference.

The researchers had a few preconditions to their attack, like the assumption that an external attacker has already managed to insert malware on a device within the targeted organization. They also consider the case of a malicious insider wanting to send out sensitive data without getting caught.

The 10 Commandments of Exfiltration

Following the experiment, the researchers came up with a technique of exfiltration based on their newly established 10 commandments. According to the SafeBreach presentation, these commandments are:

  1. No security through obscurity should be used.
  2. Only Web browsing and derived traffic is allowed.
  3. Anything that may theoretically be perceived as passing information is forbidden.
  4. Scrutinize every packet during comprehensive network monitoring.
  5. Assume TLS/SSL termination at the enterprise level.
  6. Assume the receiving party has no restrictions.
  7. Assume no nation-state or third-party site monitoring.
  8. Enable time synchronization between the communicating parties.
  9. There’s bonus points for methods that can be implemented manually from the sender side.
  10. Active disruption by the enterprise is always possible.

These assumptions imply certain exfiltration techniques, such as using regular browsing, modifying an application and being able to observe the change remotely.

The Ideal Data Exfiltration Method

The researchers came up with an attack that meets all their commandments. According to SecurityWeek, it involves the sender and receiver both agreeing on a popular Web page in a victim’s zone of access and a given time. If the sender doesn’t access the specified page at the specified time, a 0 bit of data is sent. If the sender does make an HTTP request at the specified time, a 1 bit is sent.

The receiver can determine if the sender accessed the page by checking the cache. Did the sender access it to send a 1 bit or was it cached by the receiver’s own visit (the sender did not access it to send a 0 bit)?

Basically, this method allows the attacker and the receiver to send digital Morse code to each other. It is admittedly low-bandwidth and unidirectional, so it’s only useful for small amounts of data.

A proof of concept tool was released by the researchers just to automate the method and show they weren’t fooling around. They have come up with a unique method of exfiltrating data that needs to be appreciated for the principles it demonstrates — and then dealt with on a practical level.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today