April 18, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Chinese security researcher Xudong Zheng found a way to work around add-on filters to render URLs as Punycode. He discovered characters within Unicode that could serve as functional substitutes for Latin alphabet characters and potentially allow fraudsters to mask phishing attacks. Since these characters were from only one language, using them does not trip the exclusionary filters imposed by the browsers.

For example, Zheng registered a certain domain that would display as “apple.com,” but was really composed of Cyrillic characters. This demonstrated a good proof of concept for potential phishing schemes.

Bleeping Computer reported that this vulnerability affects Chrome, Firefox and Opera browsers. Other browsers such as Edge, Internet Explorer, Safari, Vivaldi and Brave displayed the correct behavior by showing the Punycode.

A Flawed Industry Standard

Years ago, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) allowed allow non-ASCII (Unicode) characters to be present in web domains, but the firm quickly realized that this action could lead to some problems. Various characters from different languages can be confused for Unicode, since they will look the same in a browser display. Ultimately, this could enable a phishing attacker to display inaccurate URLs to victims.

To combat this, ICANN announced that Punycode, a way to represent Unicode within the limited character subset of ASCII used for internet host names, would specify actual domain registration. It was thought that browsers would first read the Punycode URL and then transform it into displayable Unicode characters inside the browser.

But like Unicode, Punycode could also hide phishing attempts through characters found in different languages. In response to this, vendors introduced add-on filters to render URLs as Punycode rather than Unicode if they contained characters from different languages.

According to Bleeping Computer, the browser-makers thought this would stop the substitutions from happening in the URL. Zheng’s research demonstrated otherwise.

Defense Against Phishing Attacks

In response to this vulnerability, Google decided to include a fix in Chrome 58, which will be released in late April, Zheng wrote.

Mozilla has not yet revealed its plans to resolve this situation. There is, however, a simple workaround for Firefox that disables Punycode support. To start, enter “about:config” in the Firefox address bar. Then enter “network.IDN_show_punycode” and set this option to “true” with a double-click.

This sort of homonym attack has been known for a while, and it was thought to be mitigated. It appears that a clever attack can still be performed using this method, placing internet users at risk of a phishing attack.

More from

Government cybersecurity in 2025: Former Principal Deputy National Cyber Director weighs in

4 min read - As 2024 comes to an end, it’s time to look ahead to the state of public cybersecurity in 2025.The good news is this: Cybersecurity will be an ongoing concern for the government regardless of the party in power, as many current cybersecurity initiatives are bipartisan. But what will government cybersecurity look like in 2025?Will the country be better off than they are today? What are the positive signs that could signal a good year for national cybersecurity? And what threats should…

FYSA – Adobe Cold Fusion Path Traversal Vulnerability

2 min read - Summary Adobe has released a security bulletin (APSB24-107) addressing an arbitrary file system read vulnerability in ColdFusion, a web application server. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-53961, can be exploited to read arbitrary files on the system, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data exposure. Threat Topography Threat Type: Arbitrary File System Read Industries Impacted: Technology, Software, and Web Development Geolocation: Global Environment Impact: Web servers running ColdFusion 2021 and 2023 are vulnerable Overview X-Force Incident Command is monitoring the disclosure…

2024 trends: Were they accurate?

4 min read - The new year always kicks off with a flood of prediction articles; then, 12 months later, our newsfeed is filled with wrap-up articles. But we are often left to wonder if experts got it right in January about how the year would unfold. As we close out 2024, let’s take a moment to go back and see if the crystal balls were working about how the year would play out in cybersecurity.Here are five trends that were often predicted for…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today