April 18, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Chinese security researcher Xudong Zheng found a way to work around add-on filters to render URLs as Punycode. He discovered characters within Unicode that could serve as functional substitutes for Latin alphabet characters and potentially allow fraudsters to mask phishing attacks. Since these characters were from only one language, using them does not trip the exclusionary filters imposed by the browsers.

For example, Zheng registered a certain domain that would display as “apple.com,” but was really composed of Cyrillic characters. This demonstrated a good proof of concept for potential phishing schemes.

Bleeping Computer reported that this vulnerability affects Chrome, Firefox and Opera browsers. Other browsers such as Edge, Internet Explorer, Safari, Vivaldi and Brave displayed the correct behavior by showing the Punycode.

A Flawed Industry Standard

Years ago, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) allowed allow non-ASCII (Unicode) characters to be present in web domains, but the firm quickly realized that this action could lead to some problems. Various characters from different languages can be confused for Unicode, since they will look the same in a browser display. Ultimately, this could enable a phishing attacker to display inaccurate URLs to victims.

To combat this, ICANN announced that Punycode, a way to represent Unicode within the limited character subset of ASCII used for internet host names, would specify actual domain registration. It was thought that browsers would first read the Punycode URL and then transform it into displayable Unicode characters inside the browser.

But like Unicode, Punycode could also hide phishing attempts through characters found in different languages. In response to this, vendors introduced add-on filters to render URLs as Punycode rather than Unicode if they contained characters from different languages.

According to Bleeping Computer, the browser-makers thought this would stop the substitutions from happening in the URL. Zheng’s research demonstrated otherwise.

Defense Against Phishing Attacks

In response to this vulnerability, Google decided to include a fix in Chrome 58, which will be released in late April, Zheng wrote.

Mozilla has not yet revealed its plans to resolve this situation. There is, however, a simple workaround for Firefox that disables Punycode support. To start, enter “about:config” in the Firefox address bar. Then enter “network.IDN_show_punycode” and set this option to “true” with a double-click.

This sort of homonym attack has been known for a while, and it was thought to be mitigated. It appears that a clever attack can still be performed using this method, placing internet users at risk of a phishing attack.

More from

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today