April 6, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

A new RAT has been spotted scurrying around word processing programs. Cisco Talos recently discovered a new remote administration tool (RAT) called ROKRAT, which is specifically designed to be very hard to detect. The RAT plays off a Korean-language Microsoft Word alternative called the Hangul word processor (HWP).

Researchers determined that the RAT was involved in an overall campaign that leveraged a malicious email attachment called a MalDoc. They believed the attackers used it to try and gain complete control over the victim’s system. The phishing email purports to originate from South Korea’s Yonsei University. The email is about an upcoming fictitious Korean Reunification and North Korean Conference.

A Returning Remote Access Tool

Talos has seen these types of malicious email attachments before. But in this case, the attack contains two HWP documents, each having an embedded Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) object. Since 2013, the known vulnerability CVE-2013-0808, which is an EPS viewer buffer overflow, allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on targeted machines.

When prompted, the MalDoc will attempt to download a binary masquerading as a .JPEG file from an official Korean government website. The binary is expanded and ROKRAT is then executed.

If ROKRAT finds itself in a sandbox environment, it will simply just link to harmless sites, increasing the stealth of the overall effort. For example, the malware won’t run on Windows XP. This kind of operational security is typical of the more sophisticated RAT campaign.

Even though HWP is targeted in this phishing effort, Word could be the next mule used by the campaign, since this attack exploits an EPS vulnerability. “Anything that could embed an EPS file could be a potential (attack) vector,” Craig Williams, senior technical leader for Talos explained to Threatpost.

Increased Stealth Factor

Adding to its complex operation, ROKRAT uses Twitter, Yandex and Mediafire for command-and-control (C&C) communications and exfiltration platforms. Because these platforms are legitimately used within businesses, it’s nearly impossible to block usage to protect from a malicious remote access tool.

Making things even stealthier, all three platforms that ROKRAT communicates through use HTTPS connections. This makes it difficult for a defense program to identify patterns in the malware communications or the usage of specific tokens.

The actors behind this malware seem very interested in South Korea: HWP is widely used in the country, and the social engineering techniques are designed to fit inconspicuously into a South Korean environment. However, the novel communication methods that ROKRAT uses, as well as the vulnerability it exploits, suggest that other targets may be next.

To help combat these types of attacks, Talos suggested implementing advanced malware protection. These protections can serve as a line of defense against these hard-to-detect attacks.

More from

Unpacking the NIST cybersecurity framework 2.0

4 min read - The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) helps organizations improve risk management using common language that focuses on business drivers to enhance cybersecurity.NIST CSF 1.0 was released in February 2014, and version 1.1 in April 2018. In February 2024, NIST released its newest CSF iteration: 2.0. The journey to CSF 2.0 began with a request for information (RFI) in February 2022. Over the next two years, NIST engaged the cybersecurity community through analysis, workshops, comments and draft revision to refine existing standards…

What should Security Operations teams take away from the IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index?

3 min read - The IBM X-Force 2024 Threat Intelligence Index has been released. The headlines are in and among them are the fact that a global identity crisis is emerging. X-Force noted a 71% increase year-to-year in attacks using valid credentials.In this blog post, I’ll explore three cybersecurity recommendations from the Threat Intelligence Index, and define a checklist your Security Operations Center (SOC) should consider as you help your organization manage identity risk.The report identified six action items:Remove identity silosReduce the risk of…

Obtaining security clearance: Hurdles and requirements

3 min read - As security moves closer to the top of the operational priority list for private and public organizations, needing to obtain a security clearance for jobs is more commonplace. Security clearance is a prerequisite for a wide range of roles, especially those related to national security and defense.Obtaining that clearance, however, is far from simple. The process often involves scrutinizing one’s background, financial history and even personal character. Let’s briefly explore some of the hurdles, expectations and requirements of obtaining a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today