March 19, 2018 By David Bisson 2 min read

Current U.K. regulations do not fully consider how poor device security could potentially affect patient privacy and safety in the healthcare sector, according to a new report.

Vulnerabilities and Increased Integration Put Patients at Risk

In a study titled “Cyber Safety and Resilience: Strengthening the Digital Systems That Support the Modern Economy,” researchers from the Royal Academy of Engineering argued that the U.K.’s health device regulations fail to adequately account for digital security as the technology landscape evolves.

“The regulation of health devices and systems has focused on patient safety, albeit not perfectly, but has not fully considered the possible impacts of poor cybersecurity,” the researchers wrote in the report. “As new technologies and systems are created, and the threat environment evolves, vulnerabilities in connected health devices need to be addressed.”

According to the study, both implantable and nonimplantable health devices are prone to vulnerabilities. These weaknesses affect low-power, low-footprint sensors as well as large-scale legacy medical equipment.

At the same time, the researchers observed that healthcare providers’ enterprise systems are integrating more with clinical suppliers and systems. This makes them preferred targets of ransomware and other digital threats.

Improving Health Device Regulations in the UK

Researchers advised U.K. regulators to address these risks by linking data protection standards with digital security best practices. In addition, security frameworks should use clear language to help device manufacturers and other parties easily navigate the regulations.

The report also outlined the following recommendations for securing health devices to ensure patients’ safety:

  • Governance — When applicable, clarify the roles and responsibilities for national and local entities in the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS).
  • Procurement — Look to other industries to understand supply chain risks. Organizations can use that knowledge to build more trustworthy products and provide customers with information about the security of those items.
  • Design — Seek input from healthcare professionals when creating new systems. Developers need such contributions to learn how health organizations implement their systems.
  • Defense — Explore patch management strategies that account for patient safety and the security of medical devices.
  • Education — Train clinical professionals on digital security and data literacy.

The report’s lead author, Nick Jennings, underscored these recommendations with a plea to build better security into systems from the outset. “We cannot totally avoid failures or attacks,” he said, “but we can design systems that are highly resilient and will recover quickly.”

Many of the recommendations for healthcare also apply to other critical sectors. The researchers noted that it’s important for private organizations to work with the U.K. government to develop relevant sector-specific guidelines.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today