September 29, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Cybercrime may seem like the kind of thing perpetrated by maverick, nontraditional groups, but a group of security researchers recently suggested they might be just as vulnerable to things that hurt their bottom line as their victims.

In a blog post published by the Google Antifraud and Abuse Research team, security experts claimed those trying to combat cybercrime shouldn’t just focus on making their network perimeter tougher to crack. Instead, the industry should work together to effectively make it more expensive to target businesses by raising the price of registering bulk online accounts that later get used in duplicitous acts, for example. The theory goes that, much like any sector of the economy, the black market reacts negatively to increased costs. This could serve as a deterrent to some hacking collectives or organized crime groups, the researchers suggested.

Of course, cybercrime has become an increasingly lucrative business, given what attackers can do with stolen customer information or by gaining access to corporate systems with data they can sell elsewhere. As SC Magazine pointed out, however, it’s rare that security research has examined the true cost of doing business for those conducting phishing schemes or distributing malware. Since criminals need to use public services to impersonate legitimate businesses, this may be an overlooked area of weakness.

Threatpost noted that while ordinary businesses may not be able to make cybercrime more expensive than it is today, there might be better measures to fight back than simply installing a stronger firewall or antivirus program. The Google research emphasized how the company was able to reduce the ability to obtain and verify fake accounts by temporarily blocking free voice-over-IP services and cellular towers. This could be an example of how certain points in cybercriminals’ black-market food chain could be disrupted in a way that benefits legitimate businesses.

Perhaps Dark Reading put it best: Rather than simply following up an attack by beefing up defenses, organizations need to better understand the profitability of cybercrime. That way, there will be less incentive for those stealing data or developing exploit kits to share them on the black market in the first place. The ecosystem of buying and selling among cybercriminals may wind up being a lot more fragile than was ever realized.

More from

3 Strategies to overcome data security challenges in 2024

3 min read - There are over 17 billion internet-connected devices in the world — and experts expect that number will surge to almost 30 billion by 2030.This rapidly growing digital ecosystem makes it increasingly challenging to protect people’s privacy. Attackers only need to be right once to seize databases of personally identifiable information (PII), including payment card information, addresses, phone numbers and Social Security numbers.In addition to the ever-present cybersecurity threats, data security teams must consider the growing list of data compliance laws…

ICS CERT predictions for 2024: What you need to know

4 min read - As we work through the first quarter of 2024, various sectors are continuously adapting to increasingly complex cybersecurity threats. Sectors like healthcare, finance, energy and transportation are all regularly widening their digital infrastructure, resulting in larger attack surfaces and greater risk exposure.Kaspersky just released their ICS CERT Predictions for this year, outlining the key cybersecurity challenges industrial enterprises will face in the year ahead. The forecasts emphasize the persistent nature of ransomware threats, the increasing prevalence of cosmopolitical hacktivism, insights…

Can memory-safe programming languages kill 70% of security bugs?

3 min read - The Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) recently released a new report, “Back to the Building Blocks: A Path Toward Secure and Measurable Software." The report is one of the first major announcements from new ONCD director Harry Coker and makes a strong case for adopting memory-safe programming languages. This new focus stems from the goal of rebalancing the responsibility of cybersecurity and realigning incentives in favor of long-term cybersecurity investments. Memory-safe programming languages were also included as a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today