The threat actors behind the REvil ransomware strain claim they bring in annual revenues of over $100 million.

Inside the Lucrative REvil Gang

A spokesperson for Sodinokibi REvil ransomware disclosed the haul in an October interview on a YouTube and Telegram channel called Russian OSINT.

Flashpoint analyzed the Q&A and learned several factors had helped contribute to REvil’s purse.

First, the spokesperson revealed that the people they represented were not the original coders of REvil. They clarified that the latter had sold the ransomware’s source code to the former. Those threat actors had then added their own code on top of the existing REvil package. The second gang used certain encryption algorithms that set the improved REvil apart from other ransomware strains circulating in the wild.

Second, REvil’s adopted owners had moved to a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model to boost profit.

What Is Ransomware-as-a-Service?

A RaaS scheme is exactly what it sounds like. Ransomware authors create a hierarchical system in which users can pay to add the ransomware into their own attack campaigns. They offer customizable dashboards and exploit generation tools.

This setup benefits the ransomware authors, too. It allows them to create more attack campaigns and claim a broader swath of users as victims. From there, they can increase profits.

RaaS deployments open up the world of ransomware. They enable people who might not have the technical acumen to code a new ransomware strain from scratch. They also let affiliates keep a percentage of the ransom payments from the additional attack campaigns.

Besides REvil, some other ransomware-as-a-service examples include NetWalker, LockBit and Smaug.

A Look Back at REvil Ransomware’s Recent Threat Activity

Back in June, KrebsonSecurity reported the ransomware enterprise had used their dark web data leaks site to announce their first-ever auction of a victim’s stolen data. The auction stated that buyers could receive three databases and over 22,000 files stolen by REvil from an agricultural company. Bids ran in increments of $5,000 with an initial bid of $50,000.

Next, the owners of REvil renewed their efforts to improve their ransomware. The first move came in September 2020. According to Sophos, REvil’s owners deposited $1 million into a payment pot as part of a blitz designed to hire more affiliates and ramp up activity. Less than two months later, ZDNet reported that the REvil gang had acquired the source code for KPOT infostealer in an online auction.

A researcher familiar with the auction said REVil’s users had likely acquired KPOT with the intention to “further develop” the malware and possibly add it to their growing list of digital crime tools.

How to Defend Against REvil Ransomware

Organizations can defend against a REvil infection by following anti-ransomware best practices. These guidelines include running (and often testing) data backups as well as creating a plan to prevent data theft.

A key part of this process involves using access controls to restrict the files and folders to which users maintain access. With these types of measures in place, ransomware actors won’t be able to use an employee’s compromised account credentials to steal data.

More from News

The White House on Quantum Encryption and IoT Labels

A recent White House Fact Sheet outlined the current and future U.S. cybersecurity priorities. While most of the topics covered were in line with expectations, others drew more attention. The emphasis on critical infrastructure protection is clearly a top national priority. However, the plan is to create a labeling system for IoT devices, identifying the ones with the highest cybersecurity standards. Few expected that news. The topic of quantum-resistant encryption reveals that such concerns may become a reality sooner than…

Malware-as-a-Service Flaunts Its Tally of Users and Victims

As time passes, the security landscape keeps getting stranger and scarier. How long did the “not if, but when” mentality towards cyberattacks last — a few years, maybe? Now, security pros think in terms of how often will their organization be attacked and at what cost. Or they consider how the difference between legitimate Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) brands and Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) gangs keeps getting blurrier. MaaS operators provide web-based services, slick UX, tiered subscriptions, newsletters and Telegram channels that keep users…

New Survey Shows Burnout May Lead to Attrition

For many organizations and the cybersecurity industry as a whole, improving retention and reducing the skills gap is a top priority. Mimecast’s The State of Ransomware Readiness 2022: Reducing the Personal and Business Cost points to another growing concern — burnout that leads to attrition. Without skilled employees, organizations cannot protect their data and infrastructure from increasing cybersecurity attacks. According to Mimecast’s report, 77% of cybersecurity leaders say the number of cyberattacks against their company has increased or stayed the…

Alleged FBI Database Breach Exposes Agents and InfraGard

Recently the feds suffered a big hack, not once, but twice. First, the FBI-run InfraGard program suffered a breach. InfraGard aims to strengthen partnerships with the private sector to share information about cyber and physical threats. That organization experienced a major breach in early December, according to a KrebsOnSecurity report. Allegedly, the InfraGard database — containing contact information of over 80,000 members — appeared up for sale on a cyber crime forum. Also, the hackers have reportedly been communicating with…