March 28, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Samba is an open-source implementation of the Server Message Block/Common Internet File System (SMB/CIFS) protocol. It’s used in Windows for network file and printer sharing. Not only that, but Linux and other Unix-like systems can use Samba to work with and share resources with Windows systems. It’s a major data path that many systems rely on, but a recent reveal may put it in jeopardy.

“On April 12, 2016, SerNet, the Samba Team and Microsoft will disclose a severe bug that affects almost all versions of Microsoft Windows and Samba,” SerNet announced on its website. “The bug is called Badlock. Due to the fundamental functions that are affected by the bug, there will be no detailed information prior to the release of fixes by Microsoft and the Samba Team.”

Where Are the Particulars of the SMB Protocol Flaw?

SerNet asked its readers for unconditional trust without presenting corresponding information. It stated that this severe bug was found by a core Samba developer but did not give any further information on what it is exactly or how companies can defend against it.

Are users to now wait attentively for SerNet to reveal more of this impending doom of the SMB protocol? How do we even know that this bug exists in the first place without particulars?

Microsoft hasn’t said anything about the flaw — yet — but it likely would keep quiet until it had a patch ready. As for SerNet, it did add that its developer “notified Microsoft about his findings, and a consecutive strong collaboration led to fixes for both platforms. Patches are currently reviewed and prepared for release, including SerNet’s special SAMBA+ offering.”

Why Do It This Way?

SerNet may have a reason to announce the existence of a vulnerability before releasing the details, but that reason certainly isn’t obvious.

Such a policy only adds to the noise associated with the vulnerability without giving any signal as to the mediation of it. Worse, the simple act of announcement can draw the attention of the cybercrime community, which would unsurprisingly move quickly to act before a patch is released — if they can find out what the flaw is.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today