May 30, 2016 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

Apple devices are gaining popularity with a dubious group: cybercriminals. As noted by ITProPortal, iOS threat XcodeGhost has now cracked the top three “most common” families of active malware.

According to SecurityWeek, meanwhile, a new threat is on the horizon for iOS. Called sandjacking, it’s a new way for malicious actors to crack Apple protections, install rogue apps and get access to sensitive user files. Here’s how attackers are breaking out of the box.

Digging Up Trouble

Discovered by security expert Chilik Tamir, sandjacking isn’t the easiest vulnerability to exploit. But if attackers are successful, it’s almost impossible for users to discover they’ve been hacked.

As noted by Security Affairs, it all starts with Xcode 7, a tool that lets developers quickly obtain Apple certificates needed to build iOS apps by providing just their name and email address. These apps are meant for testing and development purposes only, meaning they can’t be uploaded to the App Store, access Apple Pay or use in-app purchase features. They also don’t need to pass any official application review.

But Tamir discovered a way to move these apps onto active iOS devices. Called Su-A-Cyder, the method relies on physical access to the mobile device; actors must connect it to a computer, then replace a legitimate app with their rogue version by assigning it the same bundle ID as the original.

While there’s no chance of a remote exploit here, Tamir pointed out that users might hand over their device to repair shop workers, spouses or even IT department staffers. In this case, anyone with malicious intent could compromise an app and grant total access. It didn’t take long for Apple to recognize the problem, and iOS version 8.3 removed the ability to replace matching-ID apps.

Breaking the Box With Sandjacking

The fix didn’t stop Tamir, however, who took things a step further with the development of his sandjacking technique. It works like this: While Apple fixed the installation process, it didn’t account for device restore features.

At the recent Hack In The Box (HITB) conference, the security expert demonstrated that it was possible to create a device backup, delete the legitimate target app, install a malicious version and then run the restoration process. This doesn’t remove the rogue application, giving attackers access to the app’s sandbox and all associated user data.

More worrisome? It’s possible to automate the entire process, meaning with physical access cybercriminals could replace every app on the device with a malicious version.

So far Apple hasn’t rolled out a fix, despite being notified of the problem last December. There have already been a number of in-the-wild attempts to leverage this attack vector, and Tamir said he’ll wait until Apple patches the flaw before rolling out a sandjacker automation tool.

Apple remains committed to protecting the iOS environment by restricting device access and sandboxing app permissions. But this may be sinking ground as attackers find ways to dig up, push out and break through the box.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today