September 26, 2014 By Shane Schick 2 min read

There’s nothing like the words “worse than Heartbleed” to get a chief information security officer’s pulse racing, which is why reports of a bug in the open-source software known as Bash may have them canceling any plans they might have had this weekend.

Red Hat Software was among the first to disclose details about the Bash bug, also known as Shellshock. This bug involves a vulnerability that would allow malicious hackers to bypass security measures and take over a user’s computer by simply cutting and pasting a line of code. The hole allows cybercriminals to potentially steal files, change settings and access other personally identifiable information.

Several reports have already compared this bug to Heartbleed, a flaw in the encryption code of another open-source software application, OpenSSL, which is widely used in many websites. However, Heartbleed was largely a problem because it could let hackers see information; Bash could up the ante by allowing cybercriminals to actually take over users’ machines.

How Bash Shellshock Bug Could’ve Been Avoided 7 Years Ago

As security expert Troy Hunt explained on his personal blog, Bash may also be even more prevalent than OpenSSL, given that it was created in the 1980s and is practically a default utility on Mac OS X and Linux as a way to execute commands without touching screens or using a mouse.

Even scarier, a story on CNN Money noted that the Bash bug has emerged just as more smart devices, which connect to IP but are controlled without PCs, are entering homes and offices. Bash could be an option to turn smart thermostats or lights on and off, vastly increasing the number of potential endpoints where damage could be done.

Beyond isolated attacks on individual victims, a number of security experts on Twitter were speculating that someone will work quickly to create a worm that exploits the Bash bug. This means that malware infecting a machine could spread extremely quickly.

As a first step, businesses should evaluate the degree of risk they face. The Register published a post with a simple command line that can be entered to test a particular system. Beyond that, it’s going to be a matter of waiting for effective patches from Red Hat and other vendors that fully address the scope of the vulnerability. While the word “bash” suggests being struck hard and quick, the impact of the Bash bug may be felt for months, if not years, to come.

More from

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Communication platforms play a major role in data breach risks

4 min read - Every online activity or task brings at least some level of cybersecurity risk, but some have more risk than others. Kiteworks Sensitive Content Communications Report found that this is especially true when it comes to using communication tools.When it comes to cybersecurity, communicating means more than just talking to another person; it includes any activity where you are transferring data from one point online to another. Companies use a wide range of different types of tools to communicate, including email,…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today