June 16, 2017 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002 codified how enterprises must report and audit their financial information. According to Protiviti’s “2017 Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Survey,” 72 percent of the companies surveyed had revenues of $1 billion or more in the past year. Furthermore, 78 percent of these organizations went beyond the requirement for the second year of SOX compliance, as reported by Help Net Security.

The Shifting SOX Compliance Landscape

The survey queried 468 chief audit executives, internal auditors and finance leaders in U.S.-based public companies across several industries. Respondents noted that Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) audit requirements, new revenue recognition standards and cybersecurity concerns were the main factors driving SOX compliance efforts.

As a result of the PCAOB’s stricter reporting requirements, compliance activities have grown more stringent over the past year. Seventy-five percent of those surveyed indicated that external auditors have become more demanding as a result of the new standard. Meanwhile, 64 percent noted an increased focus on evaluating deficiencies.

A new revenue recognition accounting standard will take effect in the next fiscal year, which will lead to additional shifts in the compliance process. Because of this, 26 percent of respondents pointed to an increased emphasis on testing controls for revenue recognition policies.

Cybersecurity Comes Into Focus

The survey also revealed a heightened level of awareness around cybersecurity, which led to more time and resources dedicated to compliance practices. Of the organizations that released security disclosures in 2016, nearly one-third increased the hours spent on SOX compliance by 16 percent.

No matter the size of the organization, the number of hours devoted to compliance rose roughly 60 percent last year. However, the report found that costs were going down even as the hours rose. Protiviti attributed this to the growth of external service providers, which caused associated costs to show up in business unit accounts rather than direct SOX compliance accounts.

SOX is no incidental regulation for businesses. In fact, it directly affects financial results. Hours devoted to compliance efforts may level off as an organization gains experience, but efforts will always need tweaking at the compliance landscape inevitably shifts over time.

More from

Cybersecurity dominates concerns among the C-suite, small businesses and the nation

4 min read - Once relegated to the fringes of business operations, cybersecurity has evolved into a front-and-center concern for organizations worldwide. What was once considered a technical issue managed by IT departments has become a boardroom topic of utmost importance. With the rise of sophisticated cyberattacks, the growing use of generative AI by threat actors and massive data breach costs, it is no longer a question of whether cybersecurity matters but how deeply it affects every facet of modern operations.The 2024 Allianz Risk…

Autonomous security for cloud in AWS: Harnessing the power of AI for a secure future

3 min read - As the digital world evolves, businesses increasingly rely on cloud solutions to store data, run operations and manage applications. However, with this growth comes the challenge of ensuring that cloud environments remain secure and compliant with ever-changing regulations. This is where the idea of autonomous security for cloud (ASC) comes into play.Security and compliance aren't just technical buzzwords; they are crucial for businesses of all sizes. With data breaches and cyber threats on the rise, having systems that ensure your…

Adversarial advantage: Using nation-state threat analysis to strengthen U.S. cybersecurity

4 min read - Nation-state adversaries are changing their approach, pivoting from data destruction to prioritizing stealth and espionage. According to the Microsoft 2023 Digital Defense Report, "nation-state attackers are increasing their investments and launching more sophisticated cyberattacks to evade detection and achieve strategic priorities."These actors pose a critical threat to United States infrastructure and protected data, and compromising either resource could put citizens at risk.Thankfully, there's an upside to these malicious efforts: information. By analyzing nation-state tactics, government agencies and private enterprises are…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today