A new variant of the Thanos ransomware family failed to overwrite the Master Boot Record (MBR) on infected devices despite being configured to do so. Researchers detected it in June 2020, when an attack against two organizations in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) delivered the ransomware as its payload, according to a Friday, Sept. 4 report from Bleeping Computer.

The variant dropped a ransom note demanding that each target group send over $20,000 worth of bitcoin to a cryptocurrency wallet under the attackers’ control.

It was unclear whether either organization had paid the ransom at the time of the attack’s discovery.

Thanos: A Relatively New Ransomware Family

Insikt Group first detected the ransomware in January 2020. A threat actor with the alias “Nosophoros” offered it for sale on the Exploit Forum, a Russian darknet hub.

Recorded Future examined the ransomware and found that its initial offering consisted of a builder that enabled malicious actors to design their own variants using 43 different configuration options. The security firm also found some overlap between Thanos and Hakbit ransomware. This discovery suggested that attackers were using the former’s builder to generate variants of the latter.

A few weeks later, Proofpoint discovered an attack campaign targeting organizations in Austria, Switzerland and Germany.

The operation’s attack emails arrived with Microsoft Excel attachments disguised as false billing and tax repayment documents. Once opened, those attachments used malicious macros to execute GuLoader, a downloader which then dropped Hakbit as its payload.

How This Variant Differed From Earlier Versions

The variant that infected the two organizations differed from some other known versions of the ransomware. First, the ransomware attempted to enumerate local and mapped storage volumes after disabling User Account Control (UAC). The threat used a batch script to print the resulting configurations to a screen. That said, the variant didn’t save this output.

Second, the variant attempted to overwrite the MBR on the infected device in order to lock users out.

Thanos wasn’t the first ransomware family to ever target a computer’s MBR as part of its infection chain. One of the first crypto-malware threats to employ this technique was Petya, as noted by Trend Micro back in 2016. Several months after that, Bleeping Computer found similar functionality coded into HDDCryptor, ransomware which used a custom boot loader to overwrite a victim’s MBR.

SonicWall came across a program years later that claimed to be a new ransomware strain. In reality, that malware simply overwrote a victim’s MBR and then demanded a ransom payment. More recently, a security firm spotted a coronavirus-themed trojan using the same tactic.

That said, the Thanos variant did not succeed in its efforts. A programming error or custom message included by the attacker broke the threat’s ability to overwrite the MBR every time.

Defending Against Ransomware Like Thanos

The emergence of a new Thanos variant highlights the need for organizations to defend themselves against a ransomware attack. One of the ways they can do this is by emphasizing ransomware prevention. They should specifically look to cultivate a security-aware culture among their employees in order to reduce the chance of their workers falling for a phishing attack, a common ransomware delivery vector. They should couple this security awareness training with anti-spam tools that can help automatically flag incoming emails for suspicious links and other potential threats.

More from

Did Brazil DSL Modem Attacks Change Device Security?

From 2011 to 2012, millions of Internet users in Brazil fell victim to a massive attack against vulnerable DSL modems. By configuring the modems remotely, attackers could redirect users to malicious domain name system (DNS) servers. Victims trying to visit popular websites (Google, Facebook) were instead directed to imposter sites. These rogue sites then installed malware on victims' computers. According to a report from Kaspersky Lab Expert Fabio Assolini citing statistics from Brazil's Computer Emergency Response Team, the attack ultimately…

Who Carries the Weight of a Cyberattack?

Almost immediately after a company discovers a data breach, the finger-pointing begins. Who is to blame? Most often, it is the chief information security officer (CISO) or chief security officer (CSO) because protecting the network infrastructure is their job. Heck, it is even in their job title: they are the security officer. Security is their responsibility. But is that fair – or even right? After all, the most common sources of data breaches and other cyber incidents are situations caused…

Transitioning to Quantum-Safe Encryption

With their vast increase in computing power, quantum computers promise to revolutionize many fields. Artificial intelligence, medicine and space exploration all benefit from this technological leap — but that power is also a double-edged sword. The risk is that threat actors could abuse quantum computers to break the key cryptographic algorithms we depend upon for the safety of our digital world. This poses a threat to a wide range of critical areas. Fortunately, alternate cryptographic algorithms that are safe against…

Securing Your SAP Environments: Going Beyond Access Control

Many large businesses run SAP to manage their business operations and their customer relations. Security has become an increasingly critical priority due to the ongoing digitalization of society and the new opportunities that attackers exploit to achieve a system breach. Recent attacks related to corrupt data, stealing personal information and escalating privileges for remote code execution all highlight the new and varied entry points threat actors have taken advantage of. Attackers with the appropriate skills could be able to exploit…