January 19, 2017 By Douglas Bonderud 3 min read

A once-popular malware has experienced a recent decline. One of the biggest ransomware families in the world, Locky, saw an 81 percent activity drop over the past four weeks, according to Bleeping Computer. A malicious malware program’s fall out of the top 10 and into obscurity should be good news, right? Maybe not.

As noted by Threatpost a new strain of ransomware, dubbed Spora, has emerged in Russia. Not only does it come with complex encryption and the ability to work offline, but it also offers victims multiple payment options to reclaim their data or protect computers from future infections. Is this the future of file fraud?

Spora: A Slick, Simple, Semiprofessional Scheme

Like most standard ransomware, Spora leaves critical files untouched — so victims can still boot their computers to pay ransoms — and uses fake PDF attachments to spread VBscript droppers. According to Forbes, however, it has some notable, unique features. For example, Spora does most of its heavy lifting offline, meaning that it generates virtually no network traffic.

Using a combination of RSA, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and the Windows Crypto application program interface (API) to encrypt data, the malware targets both local files and network shares, even if users aren’t actively online. That makes it difficult for security professionals to track down command-and-control (C&C) servers.

What’s more, experts haven’t found any holes in the ransomware’s encryption routines, indicating that the authors took time to create top-notch processes rather than slapping something together for a small payout just to abandon it when security analysts crack the code.

How Much Are Your Files Worth?

But what really sets Spora apart are the payment options. Users have five choices: full restore, immunity, removal, selective file restore and file restore (free), each with different ransom amounts. Full restore, which ranges from $79 to almost $300, depending on the infection, promises to return all user files and access.

Immunity grants protection from future infections, while removal simply tosses the malware without restoring files. Free file restore decrypts two random files to prove good faith, while selective file restore (usually around $30) lets victims pick a small set of files or documents to unlock.

What’s more, the entire payment process is slick, simple and seems almost enterprise-like, giving users the option to take less-expensive services if they already have a file backup or only need specific data on their machine. It’s a clever tactic and, combined the solid encryption, suggests the malware-makers are seeing solid returns.

To Pay or Not to Pay?

So far, Spora has only been spotted in Russia, but there’s a good chance the code will go global, especially since it offers both better encryption and higher success rates than many comparable pieces of ransomware. But given the multiple, simple payment options, should users ever pay the ransom, or is it too big a risk?

For many companies, paying up often seems like the best course of action to avoid unnecessary embarrassment and may cost less than total system remediation. But as We Live Security noted, it’s not always that simple. Even if payment options are slick and user-friendly, how do you know who’s really on the other end? Is there any guarantee that they’ll actually unlock the files, that they haven’t made copies or that they won’t sell network information to the highest bidder?

Sure, maybe the malware creators fall within the gray hat area on the hacker spectrum. But what happens when this malware goes to auction in the Dark Web marketplace, less-skilled imitators create their own versions or opportunistic fraudsters re-infect corporate machines to divert ransom payments?

Here’s the bottom line: Spora is smooth, sophisticated and speaks to the needs of users looking for a simple way to get their files back. But despite the corporate veneer on cybercriminal activity, there’s no way to guarantee the promises of malware-makers pushing companies for quick payment.

More from

Hive0137 and AI-supplemented malware distribution

12 min read - IBM X-Force tracks dozens of threat actor groups. One group in particular, tracked by X-Force as Hive0137, has been a highly active malware distributor since at least October 2023. Nominated by X-Force as having the “Most Complex Infection Chain” in a campaign in 2023, Hive0137 campaigns deliver DarkGate, NetSupport, T34-Loader and Pikabot malware payloads, some of which are likely used for initial access in ransomware attacks. The crypters used in the infection chains also suggest a close relationship with former…

Unveiling the latest banking trojan threats in LATAM

9 min read - This post was made possible through the research contributions of Amir Gendler.In our most recent research in the Latin American (LATAM) region, we at IBM Security Lab have observed a surge in campaigns linked with malicious Chrome extensions. These campaigns primarily target Latin America, with a particular emphasis on its financial institutions.In this blog post, we’ll shed light on the group responsible for disseminating this campaign. We’ll delve into the method of web injects and Man in the Browser, and…

Crisis communication: What NOT to do

4 min read - Read the 1st blog in this series, Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to doWhen an organization experiences a cyberattack, tensions are high, customers are concerned and the business is typically not operating at full capacity. Every move you make at this point makes a difference to your company’s future, and even a seemingly small mistake can cause permanent reputational damage.Because of the stress and many moving parts that are involved, businesses often fall short when it comes to communication in a crisis.…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today