November 15, 2018 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

A recent keylogger campaign leveraged an old Microsoft Office Equation Editor vulnerability to target user credentials, passwords and clipboard content.

As reported by Quick Heal, threat actors used Rich Text Format (RTF) files — either standalone or embedded in PDF files with DOC extensions — to distribute the Hawkeye keylogger malware.

While the attacks used typical phishing emails to target users and organizations, the campaign opted for a less common path to compromise: the Microsoft Office Equation Editor. The so-called “Hawkeye v8 Reborn” exploit CVE-2017-11882, which triggers a stack buffer overflow in Equation Editor by using an unbounded string of FONT name defined within a FONT record structure. If successful, attackers gain the ability to execute arbitrary code and deliver malware payloads.

Latest Version of Hawkeye Keylogger Brings Additional Capabilities

Obfuscation and evasion are critical to Hawkeye’s success. It starts with the use of Equation Editor: Despite a November 2017 fix from Microsoft, many unpatched versions still exist.

In addition, the Hawkeye keylogger attempts to evade detection by compiling code while executing, and loading its payload in memory rather than writing it to disk. By waiting until the last possible moment to compile code and limiting its attack surface to in-memory infections, Hawkeye makes it difficult for security professionals to identify the threat.

Once the keylogger payload is up and running, threat actors have access to myriad functions, including File Transfer Protocol (FTP) copying, mail credential theft and clipboard capture. The malware also leverages antidebugging with SuppressIldasm and ConfuserEx 1.0, and uses legitimate tools such as MailPassView and BrowserPassView to steal passwords. Furthermore, Hawkeye disables antivirus tools, task manager, command prompt and registry, and the restoration service rstrui.exe is also disrupted to prevent file recovery.

How Security Teams Can Dodge Hawkeye’s Attacks

To avoid Hawkeye keylogger campaigns and similar malspam efforts, organizations should start with patching. It comes down to the Pareto Principle: 20 percent of security issues cause around 80 percent of security problems. In the case of CVE-2017-11882, this means applying Microsoft’s November 2017 fix.

Security experts also recommend implementing multilayered malspam defense, including email filtering, endpoint protection and system hardening. Given the ability of determined attackers to bypass these measures, however, it’s also a good idea to deploy automated incident response (IR) processes capable of analyzing emails, extracting indicators of compromise (IoCs), and updating all filtering devices and services with this information.

Source: Quick Heal, Microsoft

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today