June 1, 2020 By David Bisson 2 min read

Security researchers discovered that the Trickbot Trojan has replaced its “mworm” propagation method with a new “nworm” module.

In April 2020, Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 observed Trickbot deploy its new propagation method during an attack on a laboratory environment in which the malware produced nworm on an infected Windows 7 client. Via the use of a Server Message Block (SMB) exploit, the method helped Trickbot move to a Windows domain controller (DC).

Trickbot’s newest module replaced mworm, a propagation capability that the malware first began using in September 2019. Like mworm, its latest feature didn’t appear unless the malware infection occurred in an Active Directory (AD) environment with a DC. When it did infect a vulnerable DC via nworm, however, the malware ran from memory and left no artifacts as a means of evading detection. Additionally, Trickbot didn’t survive a reboot of the infected DC. Unit 42 noted that this property didn’t pose an issue for the malware, given the fact that DCs and servers don’t shut down as frequently as Windows clients.

A Look Back at Trickbot’s Recent Attacks

Back in January, SentinelOne observed the malware enterprise leveraging its PowerTrick backdoor as a means of preying upon high-value targets. In March, Fortinet detected a new variant of the malware being distributed by a Microsoft Word document. A month later in April, Zscaler detected that Trickbot’s handlers had made several changes to their creation, including the addition of several Italian banks to Trickbot’s list of targets.

Defend Against Trickbot’s Nworm Module

Security professionals can help defend against nworm and Trickbot’s other propagation modules by using security information and event management (SIEM) data to learn about the context of relevant software vulnerabilities. They should then share this information in order to break down organizational silos and remediate vulnerabilities on a timely basis.

More from

Cybersecurity crisis communication: What to do

4 min read - Cybersecurity experts tell organizations that the question is not if they will become the target of a cyberattack but when. Often, the focus of response preparedness is on the technical aspects — how to stop the breach from continuing, recovering data and getting the business back online. While these tasks are critical, many organizations overlook a key part of response preparedness: crisis communication.Because a brand’s reputation often takes a significant hit, a cyberattack can significantly affect the company’s future success…

Brands are changing cybersecurity strategies due to AI threats

3 min read -  Over the past 18 months, AI has changed how we do many things in our work and professional lives — from helping us write emails to affecting how we approach cybersecurity. A recent Voice of SecOps 2024 study found that AI was a huge reason for many shifts in cybersecurity over the past 12 months. Interestingly, AI was both the cause of new issues as well as quickly becoming a common solution for those very same challenges.The study was conducted…

39% of MSPs report major setbacks when adapting to advanced security technologies

4 min read - SOPHOS, a leading global provider of managed security solutions, has recently released its annual MSP Perspectives report for 2024. This most recent report provides insights from 350 different managed service providers (MSPs) across the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Australia on modern cybersecurity tools solutions. It also documents newly discovered risks and challenges in the industry.Among the many findings of this most recent report, one of the most concerning trends is the difficulties MSPs face when adapting their service…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today