U.S. cybersecurity recruiting and retention practices need an overhaul. That’s the takeaway from a new report by Department of Commerce (DoC) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which noted that “the United States needs immediate and sustained improvements in its cybersecurity workforce situation.”

What’s more, a recent review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) asserted that “agencies do not understand and do not have the resources to combat the current threat environment.” In other words, national cybersecurity practices aren’t keeping pace with rapidly evolving cyberthreats — and that means rising risk for federal information security.

The IT Skills Gap Impedes Government Cybersecurity

The DoC/DHS report was commissioned last year as part of the White House’s “Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure.” Specifically, the document tasked both departments with assessing the scope and efficiency of efforts to train the next generation of cybersecurity workers and creating a report that detailed both data findings and recommendations to improve the federal cybersecurity outlook.

According to the new report, there’s an estimated 299,000 shortfall in cybersecurity professionals to available jobs and intense competition for talented candidates across all industry sectors. Positions range from front-line support, which requires minimal credentials, to advanced careers demanding multiple degrees and certifications.

In addition, the report found that the federal government “depends heavily on its cybersecurity workforce, supplemented by contractors.” Since “the majority of critical infrastructure is owned and operated by private companies,” however, any shortfall in U.S. cybersecurity poses commensurate risks for national security.

In addition, despite the “general context and urgency of the situation,” lengthy security clearance delays and onboarding processes, coupled with a knowledge gap about specific workforce needs and education programs, also impact total cybersecurity numbers across the country.

Strengthening the Cybersecurity Workforce

The report recommended tapping traditionally under-represented groups, such as women, minorities and military veterans, for cybersecurity positions.

Pay is also a problem: The report found that while compensation for cybersecurity jobs is above average levels in the private sector, “cybersecurity pay is below the level needed to attract the necessary talent.” As a result, the DHS and DoC called for new funding priorities to create high-quality cybersecurity education and workforce development programs.

In addition, the report recommended “a high-profile national Call to Action to draw attention to and mobilize public and private sector resources to address cybersecurity workforce needs” and encouraged both the public and private sectors to align education and training with employers’ current priorities.

Finally, the report revealed a need to reskill current employees and displaced workers to take on cybersecurity roles rather than looking for outside talent — especially given the widening skills gap, which is on track to reach a cybersecurity workforce shortage of 1.8 million in less than four years, according to Frost and Sullivan.

Cybersecurity is now a national priority. The DHS/DoC report described key stumbling blocks, made critical recommendations and laid out a clear mandate: “The federal government must lead in the effort to close U.S. cybersecurity workforce gaps — something that can be achieved only by changing the way the country views and practices cybersecurity.”

More from

Securing Your SAP Environments: Going Beyond Access Control

Many large businesses run SAP to manage their business operations and their customer relations. Security has become an increasingly critical priority due to the ongoing digitalization of society and the new opportunities that attackers exploit to achieve a system breach. Recent attacks related to corrupt data, stealing personal information and escalating privileges for remote code execution all highlight the new and varied entry points threat actors have taken advantage of. Attackers with the appropriate skills could be able to exploit…

Who Carries the Weight of a Cyberattack?

Almost immediately after a company discovers a data breach, the finger-pointing begins. Who is to blame? Most often, it is the chief information security officer (CISO) or chief security officer (CSO) because protecting the network infrastructure is their job. Heck, it is even in their job title: they are the security officer. Security is their responsibility. But is that fair – or even right? After all, the most common sources of data breaches and other cyber incidents are situations caused…

Transitioning to Quantum-Safe Encryption

With their vast increase in computing power, quantum computers promise to revolutionize many fields. Artificial intelligence, medicine and space exploration all benefit from this technological leap — but that power is also a double-edged sword. The risk is that threat actors could abuse quantum computers to break the key cryptographic algorithms we depend upon for the safety of our digital world. This poses a threat to a wide range of critical areas. Fortunately, alternate cryptographic algorithms that are safe against…

Abuse of Privilege Enabled Long-Term DIB Organization Hack

From November 2021 through January 2022, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) responded to an advanced cyberattack on a Defense Industrial Base (DIB) organization’s enterprise network. During that time frame, advanced persistent threat (APT) adversaries used an open-source toolkit called Impacket to breach the environment and further penetrate the organization’s network. Even worse, CISA reported that multiple APT groups may have hacked into the organization’s network. Data breaches such as these are almost always the result of compromised endpoints…