March 17, 2015 By Douglas Bonderud 2 min read

In a secret, 14–1 vote on March 12, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee approved the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), which encourages companies to share cyberthreat data with one another and the federal government. Some call the cyberthreat sharing bill a step in the right direction for national security, while others are worried it doesn’t do enough to protect the privacy of American citizens. What does this share-and-share-alike measure really mean for U.S. companies?

The Aim

There are several cybersecurity bills trying to make inroads with Senate committees this year. Along with CISA, there is also the Cyber Threat Sharing Act, introduced by Sen. Tom Carper, and the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). The bills all focus on encouraging companies to share cyberthreat data with each other and the federal government. CISA would also protect companies from consumer lawsuits based on the disclosure or contents of this data. Ideally, information would be shared in as near to real time as possible to encourage prompt and effective security responses. While Carper’s bill hasn’t yet been acted on and CISPA may be stalling, CISA was quietly approved last week.

The Concern

When the first draft of CISA was released, 26 digital rights groups and 22 security experts signed a letter opposing its contents. The biggest bones of contention were that the original draft gave the National Security Agency (NSA) automatic access to personal data companies shared with government agencies and that companies were permitted to engage in “dangerous” countermeasures during cyberattacks.

After taking feedback, the Senate committee agreed to review the bill and make changes. However, these changes were not made public before the secret vote took place. Now, watchdog groups are concerned that any new privacy measures won’t be enough to protect the interests of citizens and companies in the United States.

In fact, the bill’s lone dissenting voter, Sen. Ron Wyden, called CISA “a surveillance bill by another name,” and believes the bill “lacks adequate protections for the privacy rights of American consumers, and that it will have a limited impact on U.S. cybersecurity,” according to The Hill.

The Future?

The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act isn’t law yet, but the Senate vote puts it one step closer to becoming a reality. The bill holds some merit, since increased cyberthreat data sharing among companies could help slow the spread of malware. Rather than acting as technological islands, businesses could help sink malicious code by making new vulnerabilities common knowledge.

However, any bill that grants the NSA access to private information without oversight and isn’t clear on exactly how companies will be protected from information disclosures is bound to make citizens nervous. President Barack Obama has stated several times that he would veto any version of CISPA that reaches his desk; the same may extend to CISA.

U.S. cybersecurity remains a hot-button topic as new malware emerges and companies across markets and industries find themselves under threat. While information collaboration has the potential to empower the good guys, secret votes and broad federal powers may not be the best way to encourage sharing.

More from

Making smart cybersecurity spending decisions in 2025

4 min read - December is a month of numbers, from holiday countdowns to RSVPs for parties. But for business leaders, the most important numbers this month are the budget numbers for 2025. With cybersecurity a top focus for many businesses in 2025, it is likely to be a top-line item on many budgets heading into the New Year.Gartner expects that cybersecurity spending is expected to increase 15% in 2025, from $183.9 billion to $212 billion. Security services lead the way for the segment…

Security roundup: Top AI stories in 2024

3 min read - 2024 has been a banner year for artificial intelligence (AI). As enterprises ramp up adoption, however, malicious actors have been exploring new ways to compromise systems with intelligent attacks.With the AI landscape rapidly evolving, it's worth looking back before moving forward. Here are our top five AI security stories for 2024.Can you hear me now? Hackers hijack audio with AIAttackers can fake entire conversations using large language models (LLMs), voice cloning and speech-to-text software. This method is relatively easy to…

Another category? Why we need ITDR

5 min read - Technologists are understandably suffering from category fatigue. This fatigue can be more pronounced within security than in any other sub-sector of IT. Do the use cases and risks of today warrant identity threat detection and response (ITDR)? To address this question, we work backwards from the vulnerabilities, threats, misconfigurations and attacks that IDTR specializes in providing visibility into. As identity threat detection and response (ITDR) technology evolves, one of the most common queries we get is: “Why do we need…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today