March 27, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

Favicons, those little symbols that convey a website’s brand or identity, should ideally make online users more confident about where they’re browsing, but security experts say they could potentially be linked to a new variation of the Vawtrak malware.

A senior developer at AVG Technologies explained in a blog post how thieves are using favicons to hide signed update files of Vawtrak. Once inside a user’s system, it can not only access bank accounts, but also steal a wide range of passwords using a malware module called Pony. Most significantly, AVG said cybercriminals are connecting to servers hidden on the Tor network using a proxy service to update the malware.

Vawtrak is by no means a new threat, but it is another example of how cybercriminals are beginning to treat malware as a product to be improved over time. Just last month, cybercriminals were sending specially formatted Microsoft Word documents with malicious macros to distribute the malware, according to Help Net Security. In this latest case, the approach has been described as a drive-by download through spam email messages that direct to malicious websites or exploit kits.

The use of Tor to keep cybercriminals’ infrastructure under the radar is also becoming standard practice. SC Magazine pointed out that the same Tor2Web proxy was used by the makers of CryptoLocker, probably because it means cybercriminals don’t have to package their malware with some client access to Tor.

Beyond the apparent ease with which Vawtrak can access bank accounts and passwords, it is becoming increasingly difficult to detect. Back in December, Sophos explained on its Naked Security blog how some variations were scrambling numbers to make them incomprehensible to outsiders and working in parallel with legitimate browsing sessions to avoid any suspicious spikes in online traffic patterns.

While the current case of Vawtrak is affecting users worldwide, a possibly separate attack may be aimed specifically at Canadian bank customers. InfoSecurity Magazine reported research from Heimdal Security that said Web injections were being used to infect more than 15,000 machines across the country with a botnet that steals screenshots and videos in order to carry out man-in-the-middle attacks.

As innovative as the makers of Vawtrak seem to be, the potential solutions to the threats it poses are decidedly less so. Other than keeping machines properly patched and hoping users don’t fall for phishing schemes and other social engineering attacks, the best security professionals can hope for is that more people come to realize even a tiny favicon can carry a lot of potential risk.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today