As vehicles become more and more autonomous, they rely on computer systems to provide location services and communicate with other vehicles that may be on the road.

This dependence on systems that track a vehicle’s position contributes to the collection of personally identifiable position data. That, in turn, could lead to the automatic and routine surveillance of users’ everyday travels — data that would certainly be useful to various enterprises, such as insurance companies.

Tracking Location Services

Researchers at Hanyang University in Ansan, South Korea, may have come up with a way to confuse these tracking systems so they cannot establish a personally identifiable path for a vehicle. In their paper, “Preserving Location Privacy of Connected Vehicles With Highly Accurate Location Updates,” researchers explained how they took advantage of the two different communications systems that a vehicle can use: the location-based system (LBS) and the vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication capability.

The LBS shouldn’t be trusted from a security standpoint. Operating much like a traditional tracker, an LBS usually uses an LTE internet network and can generate a time-series analysis of location samples. This gives the path information of the driver, which can establish a location history.

There is also a beacon for vehicle-to-vehicle communication within these automobiles. This technology shouts out local, safety-related messages to any vehicles that might be close in proximity.

Obfuscating V2V Communication Data

Researchers used both of these radio channels to implement their security method, called mutually obfuscating paths (MOPs). Once two vehicles are close enough to send beacon messages to each other, MOPs have the two vehicles stop independently sending location data to the LBS. Instead, each one sends the data from both of the vehicles.

This ends up generating multiple paths: the real one and the alternative taken by the other vehicle. However, the LBS doesn’t know which is which and discards the data.

Motherboard reported that the researchers evaluated the scheme via simulations. The best results were found in high-traffic situations, since this scenario offers the most V2V communication for location services. With multiple vehicles present, there were many alternate paths that could be sent to the LBS by the user vehicle to confuse any potential tracking systems.

Ultimately, this approach may pave the way for privacy to coexist with location mapping as part of the autonomous vehicles of the future.

More from

Most organizations want security vendor consolidation

4 min read - Cybersecurity is complicated, to say the least. Maintaining a strong security posture goes far beyond knowing about attack groups and their devious TTPs. Merely understanding, coordinating and unifying security tools can be challenging.We quickly passed through the “not if, but when” stage of cyberattacks. Now, it’s commonplace for companies to have experienced multiple breaches. Today, cybersecurity has taken a seat in core business strategy discussions as the risks and costs have risen dramatically.For this reason, 75% of organizations seek to…

How IBM secures the U.S. Open

2 min read - More than 15 million tennis fans around the world visited the US Open app and website this year, checking scores, poring over statistics and watching highlights from hundreds of matches over the two weeks of the tournament. To help develop this world-class digital experience, IBM Consulting worked closely with the USTA, developing powerful generative AI models that transform tennis data into insights and original content. Using IBM watsonx, a next-generation AI and data platform, the team built and managed the entire…

How the FBI Fights Back Against Worldwide Cyberattacks

5 min read - In the worldwide battle against malicious cyberattacks, there is no organization more central to the fight than the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). And recent years have proven that the bureau still has some surprises up its sleeve. In early May, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the conclusion of a U.S. government operation called MEDUSA. The operation disrupted a global peer-to-peer network of computers compromised by malware called Snake. Attributed to a unit of the Russian government Security Service,…

How NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Tackles Risk Management

4 min read - The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF) is moving into its final stages before its 2024 implementation. After the public discussion period to inform decisions for the framework closed in May, it’s time to learn more about what to expect from the changes to the guidelines. The updated CSF is being aligned with the Biden Administration’s National Cybersecurity Strategy, according to Cherilyn Pascoe, senior technology policy advisor with NIST, at the 2023 RSA Conference. This sets up the new CSF to…