May 14, 2015 By Shane Schick 2 min read

There have always been concerns about the security of cloud computing environments, but recent news regarding the so-called VENOM flaw may send some organizations into full-blown panic mode.

An acronym for “virtualized environment neglected operations manipulation,” the VENOM flaw was first discovered by researchers at a firm called CrowdStrike based in Irvine, California. The issue stems from a problem in the code for virtual floppy disk controllers in an open-source technology called QUEMU, which serves as a sort of window or hypervisor in virtual machine environments. While floppy drives are ancient history to many IT administrators, hackers could still use the exploit to penetrate systems that use common tools to virtualize their IT infrastructure, provided they have root or admin permissions.

ZDNet reported that major open source organizations have been quick to offer patches, including Red Hat Software, Xen and those behind the QUEMU project itself. In some cases, making the necessary changes will involve executing a series of commands and even powering-off virtual machine guests, which could have an operational impact in some organizations. Of course, that’s still preferable to a cybercriminal taking advantage of the VENOM flaw, which could threaten an enormous number of data centers.

The nature of the VENOM flaw quickly drew comparisons with last year’s Heartbleed, but in some respects it may be even worse. That’s because, as Fortune explained, there has long been a sense that virtualization technology allowed companies to isolate virtual machines in a way that would make them safer. If hackers know what they’re doing, they could use a bug like this to overwrite parts of a machine’s memory, execute code and do other damage.

Given that virtual machines allow companies to host compute resources on behalf of other firms, the VENOM flaw could also tarnish the reputations of major cloud computing firms. VentureBeat noted that Amazon, Rackspace and Google were all quick to reassure customers and prospects that their data centers are not at risk or that they had already addressed the vulnerability. Still, there may be questions about how they stay on top of potential bugs like this and how quickly they can plug any holes.

On the other hand, it’s important to stress that there have been no reports of the VENOM flaw leading to any actual data theft, and CSO Online suggested the hype and “marketing” around the potential danger has already gotten out of hand. For most organizations, however, it only takes being bitten once by a major security problem to become twice shy.

More from

Airplane cybersecurity: Past, present, future

4 min read - With most aviation processes now digitized, airlines and the aviation industry as a whole must prioritize cybersecurity. If a cyber criminal launches an attack that affects a system involved in aviation — either an airline’s system or a third-party vendor — the entire process, from safety to passenger comfort, may be impacted.To improve security in the aviation industry, the FAA recently proposed new rules to tighten cybersecurity on airplanes. These rules would “protect the equipment, systems and networks of transport…

Protecting your digital assets from non-human identity attacks

4 min read - Untethered data accessibility and workflow automation are now foundational elements of most digital infrastructures. With the right applications and protocols in place, businesses no longer need to feel restricted by their lack of manpower or technical capabilities — machines are now filling those gaps.The use of non-human identities (NHIs) to power business-critical applications — especially those used in cloud computing environments or when facilitating service-to-service connections — has opened the doors for seamless operational efficiency. Unfortunately, these doors aren’t the…

Communication platforms play a major role in data breach risks

4 min read - Every online activity or task brings at least some level of cybersecurity risk, but some have more risk than others. Kiteworks Sensitive Content Communications Report found that this is especially true when it comes to using communication tools.When it comes to cybersecurity, communicating means more than just talking to another person; it includes any activity where you are transferring data from one point online to another. Companies use a wide range of different types of tools to communicate, including email,…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today