July 28, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Marc Newlin of security firm Bastille Research has sounded the alarm regarding what he has dubbed KeySniffer.

Newlin described this episode of wireless keyboard security gone bad as “a set of security vulnerabilities affecting non-Bluetooth wireless keyboards from eight vendors.” Those eight manufacturers are Anker, EagleTec, General Electric, Hewlett-Packard, Insignia, Kensington, Radio Shack and Toshiba.

No Such Thing as Wireless Keyboard Security

The root problem is that all of these wireless keyboards and devices use unencrypted radio communication. An attacker can access a victim’s keyboarded communications by simply using a USB dongle similar to that used with the keyboard.

Bastille said this can be done “from several hundred feet away.” The firm did not address whether this is an open, straight distance or if it can be done through barriers such as walls.

The dongle needed to implement the attack, called a Crazyradio Dongle, costs less than $100 — well within most cybercriminals’ budgets.

Mysterious Hardware

Newlin told Threatpost that the actual hardware used in the keyboards was a bit of a mystery and had not been previously documented. Keyboards manufactured by Hewlett-Packard, Anker, Kensington, RadioShack, Insignia and EagleTec, he said, use transceivers from MOSART Semiconductor, while keyboards manufactured by Toshiba use Signia Technologies transceivers. The keyboard from General Electric used an “entirely unknown” transceiver.

The keyboards affected by this KeySniffer vulnerability operate in the 2.4 GHz ISM band using GFSK modulation, which resembles the modulation scheme used by Bluetooth and other wireless keyboards, according to Bastille.

No Mitigation

In an ideal world, these keyboards would use another kind of file transmission system since the actual transceivers already do pretty standard GFSK modulation. Unfortunately they can’t, and there is no way to upgrade the chips.

According to Bastille, there is no mitigation for this issue. The affected transceivers are inherently insecure because they lack encryption. Users should use Bluetooth or wired keyboards instead to prevent keystroke sniffing and injection attacks.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today