December 19, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Running Linux on the desktop has long been the favorite mode for many security-aware organizations like Facebook and Google. Many considered Linux a more secure environment compared to commercial operating systems, especially once it was hardened with third-party products. However, recent history shows that zero-day exploits can happen to these platforms.

Fooling Linux With Zero-Day Exploits

This week, security researcher Chris Evans demonstrated a way to fool Linux. The issue in question is not very obvious because it uses subprograms that are buried within Linux to do its dirty work. It’s also not something that would much affect Linux servers, but it would impact desktop installations.

Specifically, Evans exploited a memory-corruption vulnerability that happens within GStreamer. This is a media framework found in many mainstream Linux distributions and enabled by default. The framework allows a user to play music from the 1990’s Super Nintendo Entertainment Series (SNES) of video game consoles.

The specific problem is with the Game Music Emu simulator and libgme, the library that it uses. There isn’t much in the way of bounds checking in them, and by tricking these two programs, the exploit’s goal of activating a heap overflow bug that arises during the emulation of the console’s Sony SPC700 processor is achieved.

Two audio files are available to carry out the exploit. They are encoded in the SPC format of SNES music. The exploit will change the SPC extension of the poisoned music file to FLAC and MP3 to ensure that the victim’s Linux system will automatically open them.

The Fedora Drive-By

The FLAC file functions as a drive-by attack. Ars Technica reported that if a Fedora 25 user visits a booby-trapped webpage, just one click can cause the exploit to launch. It will appear harmless, like the desktop calculator activating.

Accessing a Linux user’s repertoire of programs can go far deeper than it may in any other operating system (OS). A Linux user may have more things available — and hence modifiable — than users of another OS. It’s also possible that this exploit might access or exfiltrate all the user’s personal data.

Not only that, but the attacker is also able to steal browser cookies and sessions for other sites the victim had visited, including Gmail, Facebook and Twitter. It’s not an inconsequential exploit by any means. Users should find a legitimate patch for the program in question or avoid using it altogether.

More from

NIST’s role in the global tech race against AI

4 min read - Last year, the United States Secretary of Commerce announced that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been put in charge of launching a new public working group on artificial intelligence (AI) that will build on the success of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to address this rapidly advancing technology.However, recent budget cuts at NIST, along with a lack of strategy implementation, have called into question the agency’s ability to lead this critical effort. Ultimately, the success…

Researchers develop malicious AI ‘worm’ targeting generative AI systems

2 min read - Researchers have created a new, never-seen-before kind of malware they call the "Morris II" worm, which uses popular AI services to spread itself, infect new systems and steal data. The name references the original Morris computer worm that wreaked havoc on the internet in 1988.The worm demonstrates the potential dangers of AI security threats and creates a new urgency around securing AI models.New worm utilizes adversarial self-replicating promptThe researchers from Cornell Tech, the Israel Institute of Technology and Intuit, used what’s…

Passwords, passkeys and familiarity bias

5 min read - As passkey (passwordless authentication) adoption proceeds, misconceptions abound. There appears to be a widespread impression that passkeys may be more convenient and less secure than passwords. The reality is that they are both more secure and more convenient — possibly a first in cybersecurity.Most of us could be forgiven for not realizing passwordless authentication is more secure than passwords. Thinking back to the first couple of use cases I was exposed to — a phone operating system (OS) and a…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today