December 19, 2016 By Larry Loeb 2 min read

Running Linux on the desktop has long been the favorite mode for many security-aware organizations like Facebook and Google. Many considered Linux a more secure environment compared to commercial operating systems, especially once it was hardened with third-party products. However, recent history shows that zero-day exploits can happen to these platforms.

Fooling Linux With Zero-Day Exploits

This week, security researcher Chris Evans demonstrated a way to fool Linux. The issue in question is not very obvious because it uses subprograms that are buried within Linux to do its dirty work. It’s also not something that would much affect Linux servers, but it would impact desktop installations.

Specifically, Evans exploited a memory-corruption vulnerability that happens within GStreamer. This is a media framework found in many mainstream Linux distributions and enabled by default. The framework allows a user to play music from the 1990’s Super Nintendo Entertainment Series (SNES) of video game consoles.

The specific problem is with the Game Music Emu simulator and libgme, the library that it uses. There isn’t much in the way of bounds checking in them, and by tricking these two programs, the exploit’s goal of activating a heap overflow bug that arises during the emulation of the console’s Sony SPC700 processor is achieved.

Two audio files are available to carry out the exploit. They are encoded in the SPC format of SNES music. The exploit will change the SPC extension of the poisoned music file to FLAC and MP3 to ensure that the victim’s Linux system will automatically open them.

The Fedora Drive-By

The FLAC file functions as a drive-by attack. Ars Technica reported that if a Fedora 25 user visits a booby-trapped webpage, just one click can cause the exploit to launch. It will appear harmless, like the desktop calculator activating.

Accessing a Linux user’s repertoire of programs can go far deeper than it may in any other operating system (OS). A Linux user may have more things available — and hence modifiable — than users of another OS. It’s also possible that this exploit might access or exfiltrate all the user’s personal data.

Not only that, but the attacker is also able to steal browser cookies and sessions for other sites the victim had visited, including Gmail, Facebook and Twitter. It’s not an inconsequential exploit by any means. Users should find a legitimate patch for the program in question or avoid using it altogether.

More from

How I got started: AI security executive

3 min read - Artificial intelligence and machine learning are becoming increasingly crucial to cybersecurity systems. Organizations need professionals with a strong background that mixes AI/ML knowledge with cybersecurity skills, bringing on board people like Nicole Carignan, Vice President of Strategic Cyber AI at Darktrace, who has a unique blend of technical and soft skills. Carignan was originally a dance major but was also working for NASA as a hardware IT engineer, which forged her path into AI and cybersecurity.Where did you go to…

DHS awards significant grant to improve tribal cybersecurity

4 min read - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has awarded $18.2 million in grants through the Tribal Cybersecurity Grant Program to boost cybersecurity defenses among Native American Indian Tribes. The program takes a big step in addressing the unique digital threats faced by tribal communities — a dedicated effort to improve cybersecurity infrastructure across these regions. The $18.2 million grant is just one component of DHS's broader strategy to enhance national cybersecurity. Administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in partnership…

ChatGPT 4 can exploit 87% of one-day vulnerabilities: Is it really that impressive?

2 min read - After reading about the recent cybersecurity research by Richard Fang, Rohan Bindu, Akul Gupta and Daniel Kang, I had questions. While initially impressed that ChatGPT 4 can exploit the vast majority of one-day vulnerabilities, I started thinking about what the results really mean in the grand scheme of cybersecurity. Most importantly, I wondered how a human cybersecurity professional’s results for the same tasks would compare.To get some answers, I talked with Shanchieh Yang, Director of Research at the Rochester Institute…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today