Separation of duties (SoD) is a key concept of internal security whereby conflicting application permissions are distributed among multiple people. For example, you might enforce an SoD policy that says the permissions of a procurement manager, who can issue a purchase order, and the permissions of a financial analyst, who can approve a purchase order, should not be assigned to the same person. Giving a single individual complete control of a process through application permissions can gravely compromise security controls.

SoD is also a fundamental principle of many regulatory mandates, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the European Union (EU)’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Not only does enforcing proper SoD controls prevent conflicts of interest, but it will keep your organization in line with regulations and help you pass your next audit.

What’s needed for effective SoD is a complete, enterprisewide view of fine-grained access privileges and entitlements to determine what actions a user can perform within a given application.

View the infographic

Roles Are Right for Provisioning, Wrong for Risk

When it comes to enforcing SoD, some organizations still use a role-based policy modeling approach. A role is a grouping of application permissions assigned to people sharing the same job; this was originally intended for provisioning purposes. Role-based provisioning provides a user access to data and applications based on their job function, or role. While this works great for supplying access, it wasn’t properly designed for enforcing access policies or SoD rules, or evaluating the appropriateness of a user’s privileges to his or her job function.

Most importantly, roles are not meant for nontechnical users in audit, compliance or line-of-business positions, who are responsible for proving and maintaining identity compliance. Luckily, there is another way to model risk.

Making the Auditor Happy

Managing access rights can be very challenging. Access itself is inherently technical, made up of complex entitlements that are not intuitive to a nontechnical user. Auditors and compliance officers are responsible for evaluating the appropriateness of application permissions and access levels, which gets to the heart of enforcing SoD. How do they know that the right people have the right access around the company?

When making decisions around the appropriateness of access, auditors care about what it is an individual can specifically do with that access. Auditors are not thinking in terms of which roles to avoid, but in terms of the activities themselves (e.g., issuing or approving a purchase order). This is business activity language, and it’s the new, more sustainable approach to implementing separation of duties.

Leading With Business Activities

A business activity taxonomy tells you industry-specific processes, subprocesses and activities that a company performs to run its business. With a taxonomy of what the company is actually doing, you can involve the business to advise on which activities are considered conflicting. This is purely business language and is intended for internal auditors, external auditors or the compliance office.

Additionally, with this business activity taxonomy, you can easily involve IT. Because the application owner will know which permissions a certain application features, he or she will be able to advise on the relationship between the permissions and the corresponding business activities. This results in a translation of access in terms of business activities.

A Sustainable Approach to Implementing Separation of Duties

Advanced identity governance and intelligence (IGI) solutions use business activities for risk and SoD management to help make access more understandable. They also provide visibility for managers in terms of who users are, their assigned access and permissions, and what that access means in terms of business activities.

The ability to translate technical IT jargon into business-relevant context is absolutely critical to better, more informed decision-making when it comes to access. This approach makes it easy for business users to understand application permissions and entitlements and quickly and effectively demonstrate compliance for audits.

Join the webinar

More from Identity & Access

Cybersecurity in the Next-Generation Space Age, Pt. 3: Securing the New Space

View Part 1, Introduction to New Space, and Part 2, Cybersecurity Threats in New Space, in this series. As we see in the previous article of this series discussing the cybersecurity threats in the New Space, space technology is advancing at an unprecedented rate — with new technologies being launched into orbit at an increasingly rapid pace. The need to ensure the security and safety of these technologies has never been more pressing. So, let’s discover a range of measures…

Backdoor Deployment and Ransomware: Top Threats Identified in X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2023

Deployment of backdoors was the number one action on objective taken by threat actors last year, according to the 2023 IBM Security X-Force Threat Intelligence Index — a comprehensive analysis of our research data collected throughout the year. Backdoor access is now among the hottest commodities on the dark web and can sell for thousands of dollars, compared to credit card data — which can go for as low as $10. On the dark web — a veritable eBay for…

Kronos Malware Reemerges with Increased Functionality

The Evolution of Kronos Malware The Kronos malware is believed to have originated from the leaked source code of the Zeus malware, which was sold on the Russian underground in 2011. Kronos continued to evolve and a new variant of Kronos emerged in 2014 and was reportedly sold on the darknet for approximately $7,000. Kronos is typically used to download other malware and has historically been used by threat actors to deliver different types of malware to victims. After remaining…

An IBM Hacker Breaks Down High-Profile Attacks

On September 19, 2022, an 18-year-old cyberattacker known as "teapotuberhacker" (aka TeaPot) allegedly breached the Slack messages of game developer Rockstar Games. Using this access, they pilfered over 90 videos of the upcoming Grand Theft Auto VI game. They then posted those videos on the fan website Gamers got an unsanctioned sneak peek of game footage, characters, plot points and other critical details. It was a game developer's worst nightmare. In addition, the malicious actor claimed responsibility for a…