“How many millions did you pay threat actors in a ransomware attack?”

“Which investments most significantly improved cyber resiliency for your organization?”

“Do you have a cybersecurity incident response plan that’s applied consistently across your enterprise?”

The answers to these and other key questions produced several notable findings in the latest 2021 Cyber Resilient Organization Study. This study is based on an annual global survey of more than 3,600 IT and security professionals in over 15 industries, and was published by IBM Security with independent research by the Ponemon Institute. The results indicate that while incremental cybersecurity investments are only stalling ever-evolving attackers, your organization can incrementally add some best practices to strengthen its cyber resiliency.

A Chronic Need for Better Cyber Resiliency: Ransomware

This year, respondents expressed the following doubts about their organizations’ ability to address ransomware:

  • Only 51% reported that their organizations had a specific response plan for ransomware
  • 46% reported that their organizations had one or more ransomware attacks in the last two years
  • 61% of those respondents who reported they had a ransomware attack in the last two years claimed they paid the ransom

Additionally, 83% of organizations that experienced a ransomware attack in the last two years had threat actors demand a ransom of over USD 1 million. Along with potential millions lost to ransoms, businesses can incur other significant post-breach costs, including but not limited to regulatory fines and customer churn.

Clearly, leaders of enterprises need to establish a mature level of cyber resiliency to better handle ransomware and other potential data breaches. A higher level of maturity means all planned and defined cyber resiliency security activities can be deployed and maintained or refined — or both — across the organization. Unfortunately, only 26% of respondents reported their organizations have cybersecurity incident response plans that are applied consistently across the entire enterprise, a figure that has remained low over the years during the annual surveys.

Explore the full study

One Solution: A Zero Trust Approach

In their search for an effective strategy for cyber resiliency, respondents cited the use of a zero trust approach. This strategy assumes the breach has occurred rather than gathering more defenders at the walls and prioritizes enforcing access and detecting adversaries in your network. The approach also gives leaders better context when making security investments.

Among all respondents, 35% reported their organizations have adopted a zero trust approach. Of that group, 65% agreed a zero trust strategy strengthens cyber resiliency. And 66% of respondents who said their organization’s use of a zero trust approach is significant or moderate cited their top reason as improving operational efficiency.

Another Defense Strategy: Extended Detection and Response, or XDR

Among those surveyed, 31% of respondents reported their organizations have adopted XDR. Additionally, 76% agree that adopting XDR has strengthened their organization’s cyber resiliency.

An XDR solution can unite multiple siloed security tools and reduce the complexity that impedes fast detection and response. Also, XDR solutions offer analytics and automated workflows to give security teams time back to tackle the most difficult problems: investigating and hunting for threats.

Respondents recommended other best practices for enterprises to adopt to mitigate the severity of attacks and improve cyber resiliency. Read the report to discover those solutions, and why and how the advantages of their implementation can bolster your organization’s security posture.

More from Zero Trust

Does your security program suffer from piecemeal detection and response?

4 min read - Piecemeal Detection and Response (PDR) can manifest in various ways. The most common symptoms of PDR include: Multiple security information and event management (SIEM) tools (e.g., one on-premise and one in the cloud) Spending too much time or energy on integrating detection systems An underperforming security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) system Only capable of taking automated responses on the endpoint Anomaly detection in silos (e.g., network separate from identity) If any of these symptoms resonate with your organization, it's…

Zero trust data security: It’s time to make the shift

4 min read - How do you secure something that no longer exists? With the rapid expansion of hybrid-remote work, IoT, APIs and applications, any notion of a network perimeter has effectively been eliminated. Plus, any risk inherent to your tech stack components becomes your risk whether you like it or not. Organizations of all sizes are increasingly vulnerable to breaches as their attack surfaces continue to grow and become more difficult — if not impossible — to define. Add geopolitical and economic instability…

How zero trust changed the course of cybersecurity

4 min read - For decades, the IT industry relied on perimeter security to safeguard critical digital assets. Firewalls and other network-based tools monitored and validated network access. However, the shift towards digital transformation and hybrid cloud infrastructure has made these traditional security methods inadequate. Clearly, the perimeter no longer exists. Then the pandemic turned the gradual digital transition into a sudden scramble. This left many companies struggling to secure vast networks of remote employees accessing systems. Also, we’ve seen an explosion of apps,…

Topic updates

Get email updates and stay ahead of the latest threats to the security landscape, thought leadership and research.
Subscribe today