On the path to becoming more cyber secure, organizations across the globe spend an estimated $60 billion per year to defend their assets, recruit talent and work to prevent and respond to cyberattacks. Moreover, security spending is expected to rise another 10% in 2021.

But while much of an organization’s security focus and spending is dedicated to thwarting attacks that come from outside of the company, often overlooked are insider threats: threats that come from within the organization. Insider threats are generally defined as legitimate users who have some level of access to enterprise assets and who leverage that access, either maliciously or accidentally, in a way that can harm the organization. This threat can come from a current or former employee or from a third-party contractor or vendor who maintains access to serve a designated business function.

Insider threats, nearly half of which turn out to be non-malicious or accidental, still have the potential to cause devastating damage in the form of data leaks, financial loss, loss of intellectual property and reputational damage.

These incidents can be rather costly. In a 2020 survey, the Ponemon Institute estimated organizations spend on average $644,852 to recover from an insider threat incident, independent of its motivation. This includes the cost of monitoring and investigating suspected insider events, incident response, containment, eradication and remediation of an insider-provoked incident.

While each sector can see different costs linked with responding to an incident, insider incidents, both the accidental and the malicious, pose a threat to organizations in virtually all industry sectors.

IBM Security X-Force set out to better understand the circumstances surrounding the insider threat risk and looked into incidents to which we have responded since 2018. We discovered some interesting trends that can help paint a clearer picture of how insider attacks can be discovered, the role which access levels play in insider attacks and where to focus efforts in order to prevent and detect the next attack.

Download the report

Some of our key findings are:

  • 40% of incidents were detected through alerts generated via an internal monitoring tool
  • 40% of incidents involved an employee with sensitive access to company assets
  • 20% of incidents were detected by a person — not technology — within the organization
  • Elevated access played a role in 100% of the incidents where the insider had, or likely had, administrative privileges

X-Force research and data highlight the need for potential insider threats to be a prominent component of an information security program based on the impact these incidents may have on an organization. While these cases can be quite jarring for organizations, they can be detected and contained, and in some cases, using technology that already works to detect and deter other threats.

In the 2020 Cost of Insider Threats: Global Report released by SANS and IBM, tools like user behavior analytics, privileged access management and security information and event management and programs like threat intelligence sharing and user training and awareness were estimated to save organizations an average of $3 million in terms of reducing or eliminating the risk of insider threats.

A recent report on insider threats found that most chief information security officers believe that human error is the biggest risk for their organization, stressing the need to continually train employees. Ethical business practices are included in numerous organizations’ annual training programs alongside content covering social engineering and cybersecurity training.

Many of the insider incidents X-Force responded to were discovered by employees, which can empower them to speak up and help bolster security for the entire organization. Organizations should include clear ways to report a suspected insider incident or an overlooked issue they may have encountered. Just as important is role-based training for employees with privileged access, which can help them remain conscious of tell-tale signs that something around them is going awry.

Access the paper and learn more about insider incidents from X-Force’s experts right here. Join our webinar on insider threats and register here. Read more about protecting your organization from insider threats here.

More from Intelligence & Analytics

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Moving at the Speed of Business — Challenging Our Assumptions About Cybersecurity

The traditional narrative for cybersecurity has been about limited visibility and operational constraints — not business opportunities. These conversations are grounded in various assumptions, such as limited budgets, scarce resources, skills being at a premium, the attack surface growing, and increased complexity. For years, conventional thinking has been that cybersecurity costs a lot, takes a long time, and is more of a cost center than an enabler of growth. In our upcoming paper, Prosper in the Cyber Economy, published by…

Overcoming Distrust in Information Sharing: What More is There to Do?

As cyber threats increase in frequency and intensity worldwide, it has never been more crucial for governments and private organizations to work together to identify, analyze and combat attacks. Yet while the federal government has strongly supported this model of private-public information sharing, the reality is less than impressive. Many companies feel that intel sharing is too one-sided, as businesses share as much threat intel as governments want but receive very little in return. The question is, have government entities…

Tackling Today’s Attacks and Preparing for Tomorrow’s Threats: A Leader in 2022 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SIEM

Get the latest on IBM Security QRadar SIEM, recognized as a Leader in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant. As I talk to security leaders across the globe, four main themes teams constantly struggle to keep up with are: The ever-evolving and increasing threat landscape Access to and retaining skilled security analysts Learning and managing increasingly complex IT environments and subsequent security tooling The ability to act on the insights from their security tools including security information and event management software…