In recent years, remote work has become a growing trend. In 2018, however, only 3.6 percent of Americans worked entirely remotely. Due to changes in the global climate, many employers have shifted their workforces to remote work if their jobs can support it. With the sudden expansion of work-from-home and remote-work practices, chief information security officers (CISOs) need to adjust their security programs to cope with the rapid shift in the IT estate away from the corporate network.

What was once a small percentage of the workforce is now much more significant, and security teams need to make adjustments to their controls to adapt to this new way of working. We’ve recently explored how security teams can enable remote workers to collaborate securely, but another area to consider is how to extend the reach of the security operations center (SOC) to cover endpoints outside of the traditional perimeter.

Intercept Threats at the Perimeter

To effectively secure remote employees, teams must better understand their distinct behavior and its implications in insider threat detection. CISOs must be able to answer the following questions:

  • How can you verify the person logging into the corporate virtual private network (VPN) is the employee, not an attacker using stolen credentials?
  • How can you verify an employee’s anomalous behavior isn’t a result of working remotely?
  • How can you help secure employees connecting to open and unsecured internet locations, such as coffee shops?

By better understanding the behaviors of remote workers, teams can focus on detecting anomalous behavior that could signal credential compromise or malicious intent. These behaviors can often be detected at the VPN boundary before potential damage can be done. On the perimeter, CISOs should determine if their current insider threat capabilities enable them to:

  • Get the appropriate visibility into access, authentication and VPN logs
  • Determine if employee credentials are being used in two places simultaneously or from a different geography than is normal
  • Identify if credentials are being used outside of normal working hours for the city of the primary employee location, or if the duration of connection is longer than normal
  • Terminate the connection, block the device and revoke credentials via identity and access management (IAM)

Recognize Threats Within the Network

If an attacker manages to evade detection at the perimeter and is inside the organization’s network, security teams should validate the threat by looking for a number of indicators of compromise or abuse. These can be derived from a number of methods, including machine learning, that can help determine if the access is from a legitimate employee or a credential thief. Within the organization’s network, CISOs should determine whether their current insider threat capabilities enable them to:

  • Model normal activity patterns and frequency of distinct activities to detect deviation from the baseline. A deviation can be an indicator of abuse, whether intentional or accidental.
  • Monitor data exfiltration attempts by the number of outbound communication attempts or connections by an employee in a given day. If an employee has a spike in the number of outbound communications, it may be an indication to monitor that user’s credentials closely.
  • Identify large volumes of data being transferred on the network that would be abnormal for a given employee. Monitoring the aggregate data transfer can offer a level of simplicity and can be a powerful early indicator of compromise.
  • Inspect the integrity of endpoints for suspicious applications that may indicate malware activity. By identifying new processes or application execution, you can contain and reduce risk to the rest of the enterprise.

If security teams are proactive in adjusting their programs to compensate for the shift in employee behavior, they will be better equipped to keep the enterprise secure by maximizing their existing tool investments. Learn more about how to augment investments in security information and event management (SIEM) with behavioral analytics to protect your organization from insider threats.

More from Intelligence & Analytics

Email campaigns leverage updated DBatLoader to deliver RATs, stealers

11 min read - IBM X-Force has identified new capabilities in DBatLoader malware samples delivered in recent email campaigns, signaling a heightened risk of infection from commodity malware families associated with DBatLoader activity. X-Force has observed nearly two dozen email campaigns since late June leveraging the updated DBatLoader loader to deliver payloads such as Remcos, Warzone, Formbook, and AgentTesla. DBatLoader malware has been used since 2020 by cybercriminals to install commodity malware remote access Trojans (RATs) and infostealers, primarily via malicious spam (malspam). DBatLoader…

New Hive0117 phishing campaign imitates conscription summons to deliver DarkWatchman malware

8 min read - IBM X-Force uncovered a new phishing campaign likely conducted by Hive0117 delivering the fileless malware DarkWatchman, directed at individuals associated with major energy, finance, transport, and software security industries based in Russia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, and Estonia. DarkWatchman malware is capable of keylogging, collecting system information, and deploying secondary payloads. Imitating official correspondence from the Russian government in phishing emails aligns with previous Hive0117 campaigns delivering DarkWatchman malware, and shows a possible significant effort to induce a sense of urgency as…

X-Force releases detection & response framework for managed file transfer software

5 min read - How AI can help defenders scale detection guidance for enterprise software tools If we look back at mass exploitation events that shook the security industry like Log4j, Atlassian, and Microsoft Exchange when these solutions were actively being exploited by attackers, the exploits may have been associated with a different CVE, but the detection and response guidance being released by the various security vendors had many similarities (e.g., Log4shell vs. Log4j2 vs. MOVEit vs. Spring4Shell vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. ProxyShell vs.…

Unmasking hypnotized AI: The hidden risks of large language models

11 min read - The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is redefining how cybersecurity teams and cybercriminals operate. As security teams leverage the capabilities of generative AI to bring more simplicity and speed into their operations, it's important we recognize that cybercriminals are seeking the same benefits. LLMs are a new type of attack surface poised to make certain types of attacks easier, more cost-effective, and even more persistent. In a bid to explore security risks posed by these innovations, we attempted to…