With breaches making headlines every other week, security teams hardly ever have enough time to ramp up and test their defense strategy before a new and more sophisticated attack surfaces. When reputation, revenue and customer trust is at stake, it’s critical for organizations to detect, respond and manage security incidents effectively. But how can organizations prepare?

Although there is no “magic answer,” incident preparation is key, and testing your incident response (IR) plan can be the difference between success and failure if, or when, a breach occurs. In fact, “The Forrester Wave: Cybersecurity Incident Response Services, Q1 2019,” released earlier this month, mentioned that vendors that provide cyber range services “position themselves to successfully deliver strong incident preparation and breach response to their customers.”

The Value of Cyber Range Training

When I joined IBM Security nearly three years ago to build out the X-Force Incident Response and Intelligence Services (IRIS) team, one of my primary goals was to guide the team to focus on core solutions that deliver value to the enterprise. However, I realized that even though our team focused on embedding threat intelligence into our IR engagements and specialized in comprehensive post-breach remediation, we needed to do more.

We needed to offer the next generation of IR preparation and give our clients access to cyber ranges, where they could practice defending against simulated threats in immersive, real-world training scenarios. We wanted to mature the experience for our clients from PowerPoint-driven tabletop discussions to real-world simulated attacks that test multiple dimensions and stakeholders within environments.

We believed these types of simulations more accurately reflected what responding to a breach was actually like — the feeling of being under pressure 24 hours a day during the event, and the pressure to analyze data quickly, provide status updates, speak with the press, work with internal and external legal counsel, and communicate to clients. We believed that if we could create an environment like this and enable our clients to train in it, each one would leave better prepared than they came in.

Let’s dive deeper into a few key reasons why security teams should consider testing their current response capabilities within a scenario-driven, simulated cyber range.

1. Practice Makes Perfect

Cyberattacks change quickly, so training must test your organization’s ability to adapt its actions and be responsive enough to keep up with new attack methodologies. Cyber ranges enable security teams to practice identifying and responding to threats in a real-world environment using a variety of technologies and runbooks. When security teams actively train in environments that effectively simulate a real-world breach, they are more likely to retain the information learned and respond more quickly when an actual breach occurs.

2. Gain Hands-On Experience

Cyber ranges offer an environment for teams to train collectively, improve their cyberdefense skills and gain critical insight into a variety of stakeholder actions within the organization. This tends to improve communication and teamwork across the enterprise because it gives teams a better understanding of what other departments are responsible for. This is critical to building a successful IR team, and it’s difficult to obtain that experience through conventional training simulations.

3. Advance Organizational Security

Training in an authentic but controlled environment can help security teams deal with crisis situations in a rapid manner. Simply put, the more security-savvy your teams are, the better prepared they will be to implement and execute the most efficient security strategy for today and tomorrow.

Fortifying a Defense Starts With People

Organizations are relying more and more on people as their first line of defense. Although the maturity of effective security technology is growing, it’s still important for cybersecurity teams to train their response in realistic and immersive environments. Cyberthreats won’t stop, so your security teams shouldn’t either. By leveraging cyber range training and bolstering your incident response strategy, your organization can evolve its approach and proactively defend against rapidly evolving threats.

More from Incident Response

Alert fatigue: A 911 cyber call center that never sleeps

4 min read - Imagine running a 911 call center where the switchboard is constantly lit up with incoming calls. The initial question, “What’s your emergency, please?” aims to funnel the event to the right responder for triage and assessment. Over the course of your shift, requests could range from soft-spoken “I’m having a heart attack” pleas to “Where’s my pizza?” freak-outs eating up important resources. Now add into the mix a volume of calls that burnout kicks in and important threats are missed.…

SIEM and SOAR in 2023: Key trends and new changes

4 min read - Security information and event management (SIEM) systems remain a key component of security operations centers (SOCs). Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) frameworks, meanwhile, have emerged to fill the gap in these capabilities left by many SIEM systems. But as many companies have begun reaching the limits of SIEM and SOAR systems over the last few years, they have started turning to other solutions such as extended detection and response (XDR). But does this shift spell the end of SIEM…

X-Force releases detection & response framework for managed file transfer software

5 min read - How AI can help defenders scale detection guidance for enterprise software tools If we look back at mass exploitation events that shook the security industry like Log4j, Atlassian, and Microsoft Exchange when these solutions were actively being exploited by attackers, the exploits may have been associated with a different CVE, but the detection and response guidance being released by the various security vendors had many similarities (e.g., Log4shell vs. Log4j2 vs. MOVEit vs. Spring4Shell vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. ProxyShell vs.…

Unmasking hypnotized AI: The hidden risks of large language models

11 min read - The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is redefining how cybersecurity teams and cybercriminals operate. As security teams leverage the capabilities of generative AI to bring more simplicity and speed into their operations, it's important we recognize that cybercriminals are seeking the same benefits. LLMs are a new type of attack surface poised to make certain types of attacks easier, more cost-effective, and even more persistent. In a bid to explore security risks posed by these innovations, we attempted to…