Cyber intelligence comes in many forms. Some is urgent, some merely informative; some is highly technical, while some is broad and generic. But all of it seems to be coming at a faster and faster rate. The challenge is to determine how to get the right security intelligence to the right decision-maker in the right way.

Security professionals can learn a lot from the way the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approaches intelligence. Years ago, the agency was absolutely overwhelmed with information on adversary activities and had to establish frameworks for dealing with the data. As a result, the military now considers intelligence at three levels: strategic, operational and tactical.

Strategic intelligence informs the most senior decision-makers, operational intelligence is aimed at those making day-to-day decisions and tactical intelligence is focused on units in need of instantaneous information.

Applying the Military’s Intelligence Framework to Incident Response

Using this framework, it is easier to architect solutions and to help all parties involved understand their role in delivering information efficiently and effectively. Let’s take a look at how this approach can apply to businesses developing cyber intelligence capabilities.

Strategic Cyber Intelligence

Strategic cyber intelligence is analysis and information that can help organizations understand the type of threat they are defending against; the motivation and capability of the threat actor; and the potential impacts thereof. This information enables security teams to plan for the resources they’ll need to protect against and mitigate current and future threats.

The data at this level should be evidence-based but can also include informed projections, including what the adversaries might do once your defenses are in place. A briefing provided to a corporate board or C-suite executive is an example of strategic cyber intelligence.

Operational Cyber Intelligence

Operational cyber intelligence is data that can inform day-to-day decision-making, resource allocation and task prioritization. It includes trend analysis, showing the technical direction of threat actors; indications that an adversary has selected a particular target; and revelations of malicious tactics, techniques and procedures. It can also be useful in identifying threats against your network.

Examples of operational cyber intelligence include information feeds from an information sharing and analysis center (ISAC) and alerts from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) about a new threat trend.

Tactical Cyber Intelligence

Tactical cyber intelligence is information from direct adversary action inside your systems or from other sources that have the potential to immediately influence your tactical decisions. This data is typically derived from real-time monitoring of systems. Examples include feeds from intelligence providers that reveal which domains have been taken over by adversaries spreading malicious code, and insights from internal monitoring devices showing that a system in the company has been infected with a virus.

Security Intelligence Drives Better Decisions

Information on the threat informs different decisions at different levels. Ensuring that you have the right information at each level can significantly improve your ability to defend your organization. The conclusions drawn by intelligence analysis vary by situation, but below are some key use cases as food for thought.

Strategic Decisions

Strategic threat intelligence can be critically important to building support for the resources you will need to construct a strong defense. Strategic intelligence often comes in the form of threat briefings tailored to your industry or organization. After receiving a threat brief, you may decide to change the way you track cyberthreats as a risk or request reprioritization of your current IT spend to enhance security. You may even build a case for new cybersecurity funding.

You can also use strategic intelligence to advocate for stronger coordination and collaboration with other organizations. Enhanced strategic cyber intelligence can help you structure your internal organization and bolster your incident response capabilities. It can also help your organization understand the degree of agility required to build defenses against fast-moving adversaries.

You should use strategic information to plan training programs for your cybersecurity and IT staff, as well as executives who will need to respond to ongoing operational situations. Strategic decisions include prioritization of system control efforts — for example, prioritizing controls based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or similar standards.

In most cases, good strategic intelligence will motivate enterprises to rethink processes — including both nontechnical processes, such as audit, and technical processes, such as configuration management — to reduce IT errors.

Operational Decisions

Operational decisions made by security professionals, IT teams and even executives are better informed with a knowledge of which tools adversaries are using, which vulnerabilities they are exploiting and what techniques other defenders are using to successfully mitigate the threat. This will enable decision-makers to better prioritize daily work schedules, build security teams and collaborate with outside departments and business leaders. Other operational decisions include the policies you put into your IT systems to automatically respond to tactical threats.

Tactical Decisions

Tactical intelligence can lead to conclusions about what adversaries want, which can help you make rapid decisions on what to block, what to allow and, at times, what to shut down. Unfortunately, lack of tactical intelligence often leads to businesses making the wrong decisions, resulting in adversaries either getting all the information they want or forcing key services to be taken offline.

Better tactical intelligence can ensure that decisions are optimized. Increasingly, organizations are putting policies in place to enable automated responses. This is a great use of tactical intelligence, but this approach is only effective when both good strategic and operational intelligence are also optimized. All three levels must come together to enable organizations to operate at network speed.

A Virtuous Cycle

By optimizing intelligence at each of these levels, organizations can improve the quality of their decisions significantly. This can become a particularly virtuous cycle, since using good intelligence will motivate more tasking, which, in turn, improves an organization’s security posture and its ability to enhance threat modeling with predictive cyber intelligence.

More from Intelligence & Analytics

RansomExx Upgrades to Rust

IBM Security X-Force Threat Researchers have discovered a new variant of the RansomExx ransomware that has been rewritten in the Rust programming language, joining a growing trend of ransomware developers switching to the language. Malware written in Rust often benefits from lower AV detection rates (compared to those written in more common languages) and this may have been the primary reason to use the language. For example, the sample analyzed in this report was not detected as malicious in the…

Moving at the Speed of Business — Challenging Our Assumptions About Cybersecurity

The traditional narrative for cybersecurity has been about limited visibility and operational constraints — not business opportunities. These conversations are grounded in various assumptions, such as limited budgets, scarce resources, skills being at a premium, the attack surface growing, and increased complexity. For years, conventional thinking has been that cybersecurity costs a lot, takes a long time, and is more of a cost center than an enabler of growth. In our upcoming paper, Prosper in the Cyber Economy, published by…

Overcoming Distrust in Information Sharing: What More is There to Do?

As cyber threats increase in frequency and intensity worldwide, it has never been more crucial for governments and private organizations to work together to identify, analyze and combat attacks. Yet while the federal government has strongly supported this model of private-public information sharing, the reality is less than impressive. Many companies feel that intel sharing is too one-sided, as businesses share as much threat intel as governments want but receive very little in return. The question is, have government entities…

Tackling Today’s Attacks and Preparing for Tomorrow’s Threats: A Leader in 2022 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for SIEM

Get the latest on IBM Security QRadar SIEM, recognized as a Leader in the 2022 Gartner Magic Quadrant. As I talk to security leaders across the globe, four main themes teams constantly struggle to keep up with are: The ever-evolving and increasing threat landscape Access to and retaining skilled security analysts Learning and managing increasingly complex IT environments and subsequent security tooling The ability to act on the insights from their security tools including security information and event management software…